Infinix Note 12 5G vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: Which 5G Phone Delivers More?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the better choice. Its significantly faster 68W charging and superior battery endurance (10:28h active use) outweigh the Infinix Note 12 5G’s lower price. However, the Note 12 5G remains a viable option for those prioritizing absolute affordability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 12 5G | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 08 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 14 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.9 x 8 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 12, XOS 10.6 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 27mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | X671 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Infinix Note 12 5G
- More affordable price point
- 5G connectivity for future-proofed data speeds
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Likely lower display brightness
- Potentially less powerful processor
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster 68W charging with 50% in 15 minutes
- Superior battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- Higher price compared to the Infinix Note 12 5G
- Camera details are limited
- May not offer significant performance gains for basic users
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is a significant advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the Infinix Note 12 5G, which lacks published brightness data but is expected to be lower given its price point. While both likely utilize LCD or AMOLED panels (data unavailable for Note 12 5G), the Edge 40 Neo’s higher peak brightness translates to a more enjoyable viewing experience in direct sunlight. The absence of refresh rate data for the Note 12 5G suggests it may be limited to 60Hz, further differentiating it from potentially higher refresh rate options on the Edge 40 Neo.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' capability, but specifics like sensor size and aperture are missing for the Infinix Note 12 5G. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo likely benefits from more advanced image processing algorithms, typical of Motorola’s mid-range offerings. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests limited low-light performance improvements. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors on either phone should be considered supplementary features with limited practical value.
Performance
Both phones utilize MediaTek Dimensity chipsets fabricated on a 6nm process, but the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 holds a slight edge. Its CPU features a pair of 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, compared to the Infinix Note 12 5G’s 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. While both are octa-core designs with the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the A78 architecture generally offers better single-core performance. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking on the Edge 40 Neo. The RAM configuration (not specified in the data) will also play a role, but the chipset difference is a key differentiator.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo clearly excels in battery performance and charging. Its 10:28h active use score demonstrates significantly better endurance than what we’d expect from the Infinix Note 12 5G, which lacks comparable data. Furthermore, the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W wired charging, capable of delivering 50% charge in just 15 minutes, is a game-changer compared to the Note 12 5G’s slower 33W charging. This faster charging minimizes downtime and provides greater convenience for users on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 12 5G if you need a functional 5G smartphone on an extremely tight budget and aren't concerned with rapid charging or extended battery life. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize a brighter, more vibrant display, significantly faster charging speeds, and longer-lasting battery performance, even if it means spending a bit more.