Google Pixel 7a vs. Infinix Note 12 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Tensor G2 chipset provides a significantly smoother and more responsive experience, and its camera system is in a different league. However, the Infinix Note 12 5G offers compelling value for those prioritizing 5G access and a large screen on a tight budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 12 5G | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 08 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 14 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.9 x 8 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.31 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 12, XOS 10.6 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 27mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | X671 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Infinix Note 12 5G
- Superior camera performance with Google's computational photography.
- Faster and more efficient Google Tensor G2 chipset.
- Brighter and more vibrant OLED display.
- Slower charging speed (18W) compared to Infinix.
- Higher price point.
Google Pixel 7a
- Faster 33W wired charging.
- More affordable price.
- Likely larger battery capacity.
- Significantly less powerful chipset.
- Inferior camera performance.
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1070 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Infinix Note 12 5G. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Infinix likely utilizes an LCD panel to keep costs down, the Pixel 7a’s OLED technology delivers superior contrast and color accuracy. The Pixel 7a’s smaller size also contributes to a higher pixel density, resulting in a sharper image. Bezels are likely thinner on the Pixel 7a, reflecting its more premium positioning.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a clear standout. While specific sensor details are missing for both, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a excels in dynamic range, low-light performance, and overall image processing. The Infinix Note 12 5G likely relies more on hardware and less on software optimization, resulting in less refined images. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also expected to be superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s image signal processor (ISP). We can assume the Pixel 7a includes Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), a feature often absent in this price bracket, further enhancing image and video quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, fabricated on a 5nm process, offers a substantial performance advantage over the Infinix Note 12 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm). The Tensor G2’s CPU configuration – 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 – is architecturally superior to the Dimensity 810’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This means faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding games. The 5nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. While the Infinix Note 12 5G is capable for everyday tasks, the Pixel 7a provides a noticeably more fluid and responsive user experience.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, suggesting efficient power management despite its smaller battery capacity (likely around 4385 mAh). The Infinix Note 12 5G’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 33W wired charging is faster than the Pixel 7a’s 18W charging, supporting PD3.0 and 7.5W wireless charging. This means the Infinix Note 12 5G can likely charge from 0-100% faster, but the Pixel 7a’s optimized software and efficient chipset contribute to longer overall battery life in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 12 5G if you need a large-screen 5G phone primarily for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and occasional video streaming, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize camera quality, smooth performance, and a refined software experience, and are willing to spend a bit more for a flagship-level experience in a mid-range package.