The Infinix Note 11s and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 are both strong contenders in the budget smartphone market, offering impressive features at attractive price points. But which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will delve into every aspect, from display quality to battery life, to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 11 edges out the Infinix Note 11s thanks to its more efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset, brighter display, and faster charging capabilities. While the Note 11s boasts a slightly more powerful CPU, the Redmi Note 11’s overall package provides a more polished and user-friendly experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 08 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 08 | Available. Released 2022, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 173.1 x 78.4 x 8.7 mm (6.81 x 3.09 x 0.34 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Haze Green, Mithril Gray, Symphony Cyan | Graphite Gray, Twilight Blue, Star Blue |
| Models | X698 | 2201117TG, 2201117TI, 2201117TY, 2201117TL |
| Price | About 180 EUR | £ 95.00 / € 97.99 / ₹ 11,950 |
| SAR | - | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 228044 (v8), 244526 (v9)
GeekBench: 1662 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 11s
- Slightly more powerful CPU for gaming
- Decent AMOLED display
- Attractive design
- Less efficient chipset
- Lower peak brightness display
- Slower charging
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- More efficient chipset
- Faster charging (PD3.0)
- Excellent battery life
- Slightly less powerful CPU than Note 11s
- Design may be less appealing to some
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 takes the display crown. While both phones offer AMOLED panels, the Redmi Note 11 boasts a measured peak brightness of 736 nits, significantly brighter than the Note 11s. The Redmi Note 11's 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) also suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The Note 11s display is still good, but lacks the punch of the Redmi Note 11.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable, with both phones offering decent image quality in good lighting conditions. The Redmi Note 11 might have a slight advantage in video recording due to Qualcomm's image processing capabilities. Both phones likely feature a main sensor around 50MP, but image processing and software optimization will play a significant role in the final results. Detailed camera tests are needed for a definitive verdict.
Performance
The Infinix Note 11s has a slight edge in raw CPU power with its Helio G96 chipset. However, the Redmi Note 11’s Snapdragon 680, built on a more efficient 6nm process, delivers smoother overall performance and better power efficiency. While the Note 11s might handle graphically intensive games slightly better, the Redmi Note 11’s efficiency translates to longer battery life and less heat.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 shines in battery life. Both phones have a 5000mAh battery, but the Redmi Note 11’s more efficient chipset allows it to achieve an impressive endurance rating of 126 hours. The Redmi Note 11 also supports faster charging (33W with PD3.0, QC3) and can reach 100% in approximately 60 minutes, while the Note 11s is limited to 33W wired charging.
Buying Guide
The Infinix Note 11s is a good choice for users prioritizing raw CPU power for gaming and demanding apps. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is ideal for those seeking a well-rounded experience with a brighter display, efficient performance, and faster charging, making it a better daily driver.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Infinix Note 11s has a slightly more powerful CPU, which *might* offer a small advantage in demanding games. However, the Redmi Note 11’s efficient chipset and cooling system can prevent throttling and maintain stable performance.
❓ Is the Redmi Note 11's 'infinite' contrast ratio a real thing?
The 'infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term. It suggests a very high contrast ratio, likely achieved through the AMOLED panel's ability to turn off individual pixels completely for true blacks. It's not a measurable value in the traditional sense.
