The sub-$300 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Infinix Note 11s and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G represent compelling options. The Poco X4 Pro 5G aims to deliver 5G connectivity and rapid charging, while the Infinix Note 11s focuses on a balanced feature set. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 695, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers better sustained performance and 5G capabilities. The significantly faster 67W charging is a game-changer, offsetting the identical battery endurance rating.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 08 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 08 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 173.1 x 78.4 x 8.7 mm (6.81 x 3.09 x 0.34 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 10 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Haze Green, Mithril Gray, Symphony Cyan | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | X698 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 11s
- Balanced feature set for everyday use
- Competitive price point
- Decent battery life
- Older 12nm chipset
- Slower 33W charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3
- More efficient 6nm Snapdragon 695
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Potentially slightly higher price
- Similar battery life to the Note 11s despite faster charging
- Camera details are lacking
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the price point, expect both to offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. The absence of high refresh rate information suggests both likely operate at 60Hz, which is standard for this segment.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size or image processing. Without this information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market trend suggests the Poco X4 Pro 5G likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), which generally delivers superior image quality and video stabilization compared to MediaTek’s offerings at this price point. The presence of a dedicated ISP in the Snapdragon 695 is a key advantage. We can assume both will include standard features like HDR and portrait modes.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture and fabrication process than the Infinix Note 11s’ MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, offer a performance edge over the Helio G96’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.05 GHz. Crucially, the 6nm process translates to improved power efficiency, meaning less heat generation during sustained loads and potentially less performance throttling. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural advantages of the Snapdragon 695 are significant.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, is a substantial upgrade over the Infinix Note 11s’ 33W charging. The Poco X4 Pro 5G can reach 70% charge in just 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, significantly reducing downtime. This faster charging capability is a major convenience factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 11s if you prioritize a consistently smooth experience for everyday tasks and aren't heavily invested in 5G connectivity. It's a solid all-rounder for casual users. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you want future-proofing with 5G, faster charging speeds, and a chipset capable of handling more demanding games and applications without significant thermal throttling.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
While not a flagship chipset, the Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG at medium settings with stable frame rates. Genshin Impact may require lower settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The 6nm process helps mitigate thermal throttling, allowing for more sustained performance compared to the Helio G96.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G safe for long-term battery health?
Xiaomi incorporates multiple safety mechanisms into its 67W charging system to protect the battery. While faster charging can theoretically contribute to slightly faster degradation over years of use, the benefits of reduced downtime generally outweigh this concern. The phone's charging circuitry manages the process to minimize heat and stress on the battery.
❓ Does the Infinix Note 11s support VoLTE and VoWiFi for improved call quality?
Support for VoLTE and VoWiFi varies by region and carrier. It's crucial to check compatibility with your specific mobile network provider before purchasing the Infinix Note 11s, as these features are essential for modern call quality.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Xiaomi's MIUI and Infinix's XOS?
Xiaomi's MIUI is known for its extensive customization options and feature set, but can also include pre-installed bloatware. Infinix's XOS aims for a cleaner experience, but may receive fewer software updates compared to MIUI. Both are based on Android, but offer distinct user interfaces.
