The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Infinix Note 11s and Oppo Reno7 Lite both aim to deliver a compelling experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The Note 11s prioritizes raw processing power with its Helio G96, while the Reno7 Lite leverages the efficiency and 5G connectivity of the Snapdragon 695. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone offers the best overall package.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing 5G connectivity and slightly better battery optimization, the Oppo Reno7 Lite is the stronger choice. While the Infinix Note 11s boasts a more powerful CPU core clock speed, the Snapdragon 695’s 6nm process and integrated 5G modem provide a smoother, more future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 08 | 2022, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 08 | Available. Released 2022, June |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 173.1 x 78.4 x 8.7 mm (6.81 x 3.09 x 0.34 in) | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| | - | IPX4, dust and water resistant
RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 10 | Android 11, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Haze Green, Mithril Gray, Symphony Cyan | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver |
| Models | X698 | CPH2343 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 125h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 315250 (v8), 376819 (v9)
GeekBench: 1996 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 11s
- Potentially higher CPU performance for gaming
- Competitive price point
- 33W fast charging
- Less efficient 12nm process
- No 5G connectivity
- Display brightness likely lower
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More efficient 6nm Snapdragon 695
- Brighter display for outdoor use
- CPU clock speed slightly lower than Note 11s
- Image processing may be overly saturated for some users
- Similar battery endurance despite efficiency gains
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno7 Lite boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 657 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the Infinix Note 11s (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Reno7 Lite’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. Contrast ratios are nominally infinite for both, typical of LCD technology. Bezels are comparable, and without detailed measurements, it’s difficult to discern a significant difference in screen-to-body ratio. Color accuracy data is missing for both, but Oppo generally calibrates its displays for more natural colors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization (OIS), a direct comparison is difficult. However, focusing on the likely scenarios, the Reno7 Lite’s image processing, typical of Oppo, tends to prioritize vibrant colors and social media-ready images. The Note 11s likely offers a more natural, albeit potentially less polished, image. The absence of details regarding the main sensor size makes it impossible to determine which phone captures more detail. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors on either device should be considered marketing filler and largely ignored.
Performance
The core architectural difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Note 11s uses the Mediatek Helio G96 (12nm), featuring a dual-cluster configuration with 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Oppo Reno7 Lite employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. The Snapdragon 695’s 6nm process provides a significant efficiency advantage, reducing heat and improving sustained performance. While the Note 11s has a slightly higher clock speed on its prime cores, the Snapdragon 695’s architecture and process node translate to a smoother overall experience, especially in multitasking and prolonged gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 695 also includes an integrated 5G modem, a feature absent in the Note 11s.
Battery Life
Both the Infinix Note 11s and Oppo Reno7 Lite achieve an endurance rating of 125 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ. Both support 33W wired charging, but the Reno7 Lite offers faster real-world charging: 31% in 15 minutes and 100% in 63 minutes. The Reno7 Lite also supports Power Delivery (PD) and reverse wired charging, adding to its versatility. The Snapdragon 695’s efficiency further contributes to the Reno7 Lite’s ability to maintain battery life throughout the day, despite the similar endurance rating.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 11s if you frequently play demanding mobile games and need the highest possible CPU performance within this price bracket. Its Helio G96 chipset, with its Cortex-A76 cores, will deliver a noticeable advantage in graphically intensive titles. Buy the Oppo Reno7 Lite if you value 5G connectivity, efficient power management, and a brighter display for outdoor visibility. The Snapdragon 695 offers a balanced experience, and the Reno7 Lite’s faster charging is a significant convenience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo Reno7 Lite struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 isn't a flagship chipset, it's capable of running Genshin Impact at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The 6nm process helps prevent significant throttling, allowing for sustained performance. However, users seeking the highest possible graphics settings should consider a more powerful device.
❓ Is the 33W charging on both phones truly fast, or is it just a marketing number?
33W charging is considered fast charging, but the Reno7 Lite’s implementation is more efficient. It reaches 31% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 63 minutes, demonstrating a quicker overall charge time compared to what’s likely achievable on the Infinix Note 11s, even with the same wattage.
❓ How important is 5G connectivity on the Oppo Reno7 Lite if I don't have 5G coverage in my area?
Even without immediate 5G access, the integrated 5G modem future-proofs the Reno7 Lite. As 5G networks expand, you'll be ready to take advantage of faster speeds. Furthermore, the 5G modem often offers improved 4G connectivity and efficiency compared to older 4G-only modems.
