The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Infinix Note 11i and Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G are two strong contenders. Both offer 5G connectivity, but diverge significantly in chipset choice and charging speed, creating a clear battle between efficiency and raw power. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 810 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Infinix Note 11i’s Helio G85, and the 33W fast charging significantly reduces downtime. While both offer similar battery endurance, the Poco’s faster charging is a key advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 15 | 2021, November 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 15 | Available. Released 2021, November 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 173.2 x 78.7 x 8.8 mm (6.82 x 3.10 x 0.35 in) | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Poco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue |
| Models | - | 21091116AG, MZB0BGVIN |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.07 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1553:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 296721 (v8), 353663 (v9)
GeekBench: 1797 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 11i
- Potentially lower initial cost
- Decent battery endurance
- Adequate for basic smartphone tasks
- Slower processor (Helio G85)
- Significantly slower charging (18W)
- Less future-proof
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
- Faster processor (Dimensity 810)
- Much faster charging (33W, 59 min)
- Better thermal management
- Brighter display
- May be slightly more expensive
- Similar battery endurance to the Note 11i
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a contrast ratio of 1553:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, the Poco M4 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 510 nits, which will translate to better visibility outdoors compared to the Infinix Note 11i, whose brightness is not specified. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Poco’s higher brightness gives it an edge in real-world usability. The lack of high refresh rate information for either device suggests a standard 60Hz experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market positioning, it’s safe to assume both rely on relatively modest camera setups. Focusing on the chipset, the Dimensity 810 in the Poco M4 Pro 5G includes a more capable image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses in this segment suggests both phones likely include one, but these are generally of limited practical use.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco M4 Pro 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) utilizes more efficient fabrication and features faster Cortex-A76 cores (2.4 GHz) compared to the Infinix Note 11i’s Helio G85 (12nm) with its Cortex-A75 cores (2.0 GHz). This translates to a roughly 20-30% performance advantage for the Poco in CPU-intensive tasks and a more substantial gain in GPU performance. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Infinix Note 11i will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the Poco offers a more responsive and future-proof experience.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 123 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the Poco M4 Pro 5G’s 33W wired charging is a significant advantage, achieving a full charge in just 59 minutes. The Infinix Note 11i’s 18W charging will take considerably longer, potentially over two hours for a complete recharge. This difference in charging speed is crucial for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 11i if you prioritize a slightly lower initial cost and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G if you want a smoother experience for gaming, multitasking, and benefit from significantly faster charging speeds, making it ideal for users who are always on the go.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mediatek Dimensity 810 in the Poco M4 Pro 5G capable of running demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 810 isn't a flagship chipset, it's capable of running Genshin Impact at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some frame drops during intense combat, but it's a playable experience. The Helio G85 in the Infinix Note 11i will struggle with Genshin Impact, requiring significantly lower settings and potentially still experiencing lag.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Poco M4 Pro 5G compared to the 18W charging on the Infinix Note 11i in real-world use?
The Poco M4 Pro 5G can charge from 0-100% in approximately 59 minutes. The Infinix Note 11i, with its 18W charging, will likely take over 2 hours to achieve a full charge. This means you can quickly top up the Poco M4 Pro 5G during a short break, while the Note 11i requires a much longer charging period.
❓ Does the Poco M4 Pro 5G support carrier aggregation for improved 5G speeds?
Yes, the Mediatek Dimensity 810 supports carrier aggregation, which allows it to combine multiple 5G bands for faster and more stable connections, provided your carrier supports it. This is a significant advantage over devices with limited 5G band support.
❓ What type of display technology does each phone use, and does either offer a high refresh rate?
Both phones likely utilize IPS LCD panels, based on their price point and specifications. Neither manufacturer explicitly states a high refresh rate (90Hz or 120Hz), suggesting both operate at a standard 60Hz refresh rate. The Poco M4 Pro 5G has a brighter display, offering better visibility in sunlight.
