The Infinix Note 10 and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro represent compelling options in the crowded budget and mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches. The Note 10 focuses on providing a well-rounded package, while the Poco X3 Pro prioritizes raw processing power, particularly for gaming. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset delivers significantly better performance, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. While the Infinix Note 10 offers a respectable experience, the Poco X3 Pro’s performance advantage justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 12 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 07 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 173.2 x 78.7 x 8.8 mm (6.82 x 3.10 x 0.35 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, Emerald Green | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | X693 | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 170 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 10
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery life (112h endurance)
- Suitable for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly weaker processor (Helio G85)
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Limited gaming performance
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 860 processor
- Fast 33W charging
- Excellent gaming performance
- Higher price compared to Infinix Note 10
- Battery life is comparable, not superior
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like resolution, refresh rate, and peak brightness are missing for the Infinix Note 10. The Poco X3 Pro’s display, while not explicitly detailed beyond the contrast ratio, benefits from the Snapdragon 860’s processing power to handle higher refresh rates if supported, leading to smoother scrolling and animations. Without knowing the Note 10’s panel technology, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles relative to the Poco X3 Pro.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are absent. Without sensor size, aperture information, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the Poco X3 Pro’s focus on overall performance, it’s likely to have a more sophisticated image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 860, potentially leading to better image quality and faster processing times. The Note 10’s camera is likely adequate for casual photography, but the Poco X3 Pro is expected to offer a more versatile and capable camera experience.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Poco X3 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Infinix Note 10’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). The Snapdragon 860’s Kryo 485 cores, with a prime core clocked at 2.96 GHz, offer significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance. The 7nm process node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Helio G85, while capable for everyday tasks, will struggle with graphically intensive games and multitasking compared to the Poco X3 Pro.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Infinix Note 10’s 18W charging. The Poco X3 Pro can reach 59% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes, significantly reducing downtime. While the Note 10’s battery life may be similar, the slower charging speed is a notable drawback for users who need to quickly top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 10 if you prioritize a balanced experience with adequate performance for everyday tasks, social media, and light gaming, and are looking for the most affordable option. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you are a mobile gamer, frequently use demanding apps, or simply want a phone that feels noticeably faster and more responsive, and are willing to spend a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 860 is known for its efficient thermal management. While it may get warm during extended gaming, the 7nm process node and Qualcomm’s thermal throttling mechanisms help prevent overheating and maintain stable performance. However, using a case that restricts airflow could exacerbate heat buildup.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between the two phones really noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the 33W charging on the Poco X3 Pro is a significant advantage. Being able to gain 59% charge in just 30 minutes is incredibly convenient, especially if you frequently find yourself needing to quickly top up your battery. The Infinix Note 10’s 18W charging will take considerably longer.
❓ Can the Infinix Note 10 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Infinix Note 10 can *run* these games, but likely at lower graphics settings and frame rates to maintain a playable experience. The Helio G85 simply lacks the processing power to deliver a smooth, high-fidelity gaming experience compared to the Poco X3 Pro.
❓ Does the Poco X3 Pro support 5G connectivity?
No, the Poco X3 Pro does not support 5G connectivity. It is a 4G LTE device. This is a trade-off made to keep the cost down while still offering excellent performance within the 4G ecosystem.
