The Infinix Note 10 and Tecno Camon 17 Pro represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver a balance of features without breaking the bank, but they prioritize different aspects. The Note 10 leans towards all-around usability, while the Camon 17 Pro focuses on camera capabilities and slightly enhanced performance. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Tecno Camon 17 Pro is the better choice. Its Helio G95 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Note 10’s Helio G85, and the faster 25W/33W charging significantly reduces downtime. While both offer similar battery endurance ratings, the Camon 17 Pro’s quicker top-up speeds are a practical advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 12 | 2021, May 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 07 | Available. Released 2021, June 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 173.2 x 78.7 x 8.8 mm (6.82 x 3.10 x 0.35 in) | 168.9 x 77 x 9 mm (6.65 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, HIOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP | 48 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 16 MP | 48 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W / 33W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, Emerald Green | California Silver, Malibu Blue |
| Models | X693 | CG8, CG8h |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 280 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 140h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 781:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.4 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 309107 (v8)
GeekBench: 1668 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 10
- More affordable price point
- Solid all-around performance for basic tasks
- Decent battery endurance
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Camon 17 Pro
- Potentially lower camera quality
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
- Faster charging (25W/33W)
- More powerful Helio G95 chipset
- Likely superior camera performance
- Slightly higher price
- Battery endurance is similar to the Note 10
- May experience more heat under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both the Infinix Note 10 and Tecno Camon 17 Pro share a similar contrast ratio of 781:1, suggesting comparable image quality in terms of blacks and whites. However, the Tecno Camon 17 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 538 nits, which will translate to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While neither device specifies panel technology (IPS, AMOLED), the brightness advantage of the Camon 17 Pro is a tangible benefit for outdoor use. Bezels are likely similar given the price points, and color accuracy is expected to be standard for this segment.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed with a focus on photography, but the Tecno Camon 17 Pro likely has the advantage. While both devices offer 'Photo/Video' capabilities, the G95’s image signal processor (ISP) is more advanced, enabling better noise reduction and dynamic range. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Camon 17 Pro’s chipset suggests superior image processing. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Camon 17 Pro, if equipped, would further enhance low-light photography and video recording stability. We can safely assume both phones include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, but the Camon 17 Pro’s processing power will likely deliver more refined results.
Performance
The Tecno Camon 17 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G95 chipset represents a clear upgrade over the Infinix Note 10’s Helio G85. The G95 utilizes two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz, compared to the Note 10’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. This architectural improvement, combined with the slightly higher clock speed, results in a more responsive experience, particularly in demanding applications and games. While both chipsets are 12nm, the G95’s core design offers better single-core performance. The Note 10’s 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores are matched by the Camon 17 Pro’s 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, meaning multi-core performance differences will be less pronounced, but the G95 still holds an edge.
Battery Life
Both the Infinix Note 10 and Tecno Camon 17 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 140 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the charging capabilities are where they diverge significantly. The Note 10 is limited to 18W wired charging, while the Camon 17 Pro supports 25W/33W charging. This means the Camon 17 Pro can replenish its battery much faster, reducing downtime. A full charge from 0-100% on the Note 10 will take considerably longer than on the Camon 17 Pro, making the latter a more convenient option for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 10 if you prioritize a consistently smooth experience for everyday tasks and light gaming, and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Tecno Camon 17 Pro if you frequently capture photos and videos, enjoy mobile gaming, and value faster charging to minimize interruptions. The Camon 17 Pro is the better option for users who demand more from their smartphone.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Helio G95 in the Camon 17 Pro get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the Helio G85 in the Note 10?
The Helio G95 is a more powerful chipset and will generate more heat under sustained load. While both phones likely have thermal management systems, the Camon 17 Pro may experience slightly more throttling during prolonged gaming. However, the performance gains generally outweigh the potential for increased heat.
❓ Is the camera on the Tecno Camon 17 Pro significantly better for low-light photography, and does it offer features like Night Mode?
The Camon 17 Pro’s Helio G95 chipset has a more advanced ISP, which should result in better low-light performance. While specific features like Night Mode aren’t confirmed, it’s highly probable that the Camon 17 Pro includes such a mode to enhance image quality in dark environments. The larger sensor (if equipped) would further improve low-light capabilities.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Infinix Note 10 with its 18W charger?
With an 18W charger, the Infinix Note 10 will likely take around 2.5 to 3 hours to fully charge from 0% to 100%. This is considerably slower than the Tecno Camon 17 Pro’s charging time.
❓ Will the Tecno Camon 17 Pro support higher refresh rate displays in the future through software updates?
Neither device currently supports a high refresh rate display. While software updates can sometimes optimize display performance, it's unlikely that either phone will gain a high refresh rate feature post-launch, as it requires specific hardware support.
