Both the Infinix Note 10 Pro and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China variant) target the competitive mid-range smartphone market, but they take distinctly different approaches. The Infinix prioritizes endurance and a reasonable price, while the Redmi Note 10 Pro aims for a more premium experience with significantly faster charging and a more powerful processor. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and convenience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset and 67W charging drastically outperform the Infinix Note 10 Pro’s Helio G95 and 33W charging. However, the Infinix offers respectable battery life and a lower price point, making it a viable option for budget-conscious users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 12 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 07 | Available. Released 2021, June 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 172.8 x 78.3 x 7.8 mm (6.80 x 3.08 x 0.31 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.09" | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, Nordic Secret | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | X695, X695D | - |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 0.61 W/kg (head) 0.22 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 128h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-25.3 LUFS (Very good)
| - |
Infinix Note 10 Pro
- Longer battery endurance (128h rating)
- More affordable price point
- Decent gaming performance for the price
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Less powerful processor (Helio G95)
- Lower display brightness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
- Significantly faster charging (67W, 42 min)
- Much more powerful processor (Dimensity 1100)
- Likely superior display quality
- Potentially shorter battery life
- Higher price tag
- Limited availability (China variant)
Display Comparison
The Infinix Note 10 Pro features a display with a measured peak brightness of 447 nits and a 1326:1 contrast ratio. While adequate for indoor use, this falls short of the brightness levels often found in competing devices. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, but given Xiaomi’s typical offerings, it likely boasts a higher peak brightness and potentially a more color-accurate panel. The lack of information on the Redmi’s panel technology makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Infinix’s contrast ratio suggests a standard IPS LCD, while the Redmi may incorporate AMOLED technology.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. However, given Xiaomi’s history, the Redmi Note 10 Pro likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger primary sensor and potentially optical image stabilization. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on many phones in this segment is unlikely to be a significant benefit for most users, and its presence doesn’t indicate a superior camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Note 10 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Helio G95 (12nm), an octa-core processor geared towards gaming, with a CPU configuration of 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) is powered by the significantly more advanced Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6nm). This represents a substantial leap in performance; the Dimensity 1100’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.6 GHz, deliver considerably faster processing speeds. The 6nm manufacturing process also translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling compared to the Helio G95’s 12nm process. This means the Redmi Note 10 Pro will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease and maintain sustained performance for longer periods.
Battery Life
The Infinix Note 10 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 128 hours, suggesting solid battery life. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro compensates for any potential battery capacity difference with its blazing-fast 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% charge in just 42 minutes. The Infinix Note 10 Pro’s 33W charging is respectable, but significantly slower. This difference in charging speed dramatically impacts user convenience, allowing the Redmi Note 10 Pro to quickly top up its battery during short breaks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 10 Pro if you need a phone that can reliably last a full day on a single charge and you’re on a tight budget. It’s a solid all-rounder for everyday tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you prioritize speed, gaming performance, and the convenience of incredibly fast charging – even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 1100 in the Redmi Note 10 Pro prone to overheating during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1100’s 6nm process and Xiaomi’s thermal management solutions generally mitigate overheating. While some heat generation is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the Redmi Note 10 Pro is less likely to experience significant throttling compared to devices with less efficient chipsets like the Helio G95 in the Infinix Note 10 Pro.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 10 Pro compared to the 33W charging on the Infinix Note 10 Pro in real-world usage?
The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 10 Pro can fully charge the device in approximately 42 minutes, while the 33W charging on the Infinix Note 10 Pro will take considerably longer – likely over an hour and a half. This means you can quickly top up the Redmi Note 10 Pro during a short break, whereas the Infinix Note 10 Pro requires a more substantial charging period.
❓ Does the Infinix Note 10 Pro support any form of fast charging protocols beyond 33W?
The provided specifications only mention 33W wired charging. It's unlikely to support significantly faster protocols, limiting its charging speed compared to the Redmi Note 10 Pro's 67W capability and support for PD3.0.
