The Infinix Note 10 Pro and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a feature-rich experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches. The Poco X3 Pro prioritizes raw processing power with its Snapdragon 860, while the Infinix Note 10 Pro focuses on balancing performance with extended battery life and a respectable display.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset provides a significant performance advantage, particularly for gaming, and the faster charging mitigates the slightly smaller battery capacity. However, users prioritizing maximum battery endurance may find the Infinix Note 10 Pro more appealing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 12 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 07 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 172.8 x 78.3 x 7.8 mm (6.80 x 3.08 x 0.31 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.09" | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, Nordic Secret | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | X695, X695D | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 180 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | 0.61 W/kg (head) 0.22 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 128h
|
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-25.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 10 Pro
- Longer battery life (128h endurance)
- Potentially more affordable
- 33W fast charging
- Inferior chipset performance (Helio G95)
- Lower peak display brightness
- Less refined camera processing
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Significantly faster performance (Snapdragon 860)
- Faster charging (0-100% in 59 mins)
- Likely superior camera image quality
- Shorter battery life (112h endurance)
- Potentially higher price
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, but differ in other key areas. The Poco X3 Pro boasts a contrast ratio of 1401:1 (nominal), slightly edging out the Infinix Note 10 Pro’s 1326:1. More importantly, the Infinix Note 10 Pro’s measured peak brightness of 447 nits is lower than what we’d expect, potentially impacting outdoor visibility. While both manufacturers don't specify panel technology, the Poco X3 Pro's display is generally considered more vibrant and color-accurate based on user reports, likely due to superior calibration.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer a multi-camera setup, but details beyond 'Photo/Video' capabilities are limited. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given Xiaomi’s generally more sophisticated image processing algorithms, the Poco X3 Pro is likely to produce more refined images, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Poco X3 Pro, if present (not specified in data), would further enhance image quality and video stabilization. The 2MP macro cameras on both devices are likely to offer limited utility.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Poco X3 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Infinix Note 10 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm). The Snapdragon 860’s Kryo 485 cores, with a prime core clocked at 2.96 GHz, deliver significantly faster CPU and GPU performance. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Helio G95 is capable, it struggles to keep pace with the Snapdragon 860 in demanding tasks. The Poco X3 Pro’s superior chipset translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more enjoyable gaming experience.
Battery Life
The Infinix Note 10 Pro holds a slight edge in endurance with a rated 128 hours, compared to the Poco X3 Pro’s 112 hours. However, this advantage is partially offset by the Poco X3 Pro’s significantly faster charging. The Poco X3 Pro can reach 59% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes with its 33W wired charging, while the Infinix Note 10 Pro’s charging speed is not detailed beyond '33W wired'. The Snapdragon 860’s improved efficiency also helps to mitigate the impact of the smaller battery capacity, meaning real-world battery life differences may be less pronounced than the endurance ratings suggest.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 10 Pro if you need a phone that can reliably last a full day and beyond on a single charge, and your primary use cases don't heavily involve demanding mobile games. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you prioritize gaming performance, fast charging, and a more responsive overall experience, even if it means slightly less battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 860 in the Poco X3 Pro get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 860 is more efficient than the Helio G95, it can still experience thermal throttling during extended, graphically intensive gaming. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s thermal design is generally effective at mitigating this, and throttling is typically less severe than on devices with less robust cooling solutions.
❓ Is the 33W charging on both phones equally effective?
No. The Poco X3 Pro’s 33W charging is demonstrably faster, reaching 100% in 59 minutes. The Infinix Note 10 Pro’s charging time is not specified beyond '33W wired', suggesting it’s slower. This faster charging significantly reduces downtime for the Poco X3 Pro.
❓ How much of a performance difference will I notice between the Helio G95 and Snapdragon 860 in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and video playback, the difference will be minimal. However, when launching demanding apps, multitasking, or playing graphically intensive games, the Snapdragon 860 will provide a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience.
