The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G and Infinix Note 10 Pro represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The A52s 5G, leveraging Qualcomm's Snapdragon 778G, aims for a balance of performance and 5G connectivity, while the Infinix Note 10 Pro prioritizes battery endurance and a high refresh rate display, powered by MediaTek’s Helio G95. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device delivers the most value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset offers significantly better performance and efficiency, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While the Infinix Note 10 Pro boasts longer endurance, the A52s 5G’s overall refinement and 5G capabilities justify the slight price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 12 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 07 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 172.8 x 78.3 x 7.8 mm (6.80 x 3.08 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.09" | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, Nordic Secret | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | X695, X695D | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 180 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | 0.61 W/kg (head) 0.22 W/kg (body) | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 128h
|
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-25.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 10 Pro
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 778G
- Brighter and more vibrant AMOLED display
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More refined software experience
- Slightly shorter battery life than the Note 10 Pro
- Slower charging speed (25W)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Excellent battery endurance (128h rating)
- Faster 33W wired charging
- More affordable price point
- Large display size
- Less powerful Helio G95 chipset
- Dimmer LCD display with lower contrast
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 800 nits compared to the Infinix Note 10 Pro’s 447 nits. This translates to much better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While Infinix quotes a 1326:1 contrast ratio, Samsung’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (typical of AMOLED panels) delivers deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. Both phones offer a 6.5-inch display, but the A52s 5G’s AMOLED technology provides superior color accuracy and viewing angles. The Note 10 Pro’s LCD panel, while adequate, lacks the visual punch of the A52s 5G.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G likely holds an edge in image processing. While both are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, the A52s 5G benefits from Samsung’s well-regarded image algorithms. Sensor size data is missing for both, but the A52s 5G’s image quality is generally considered superior in various lighting conditions. The Note 10 Pro’s camera is still competent, but it’s unlikely to match the dynamic range and detail captured by the A52s 5G. It's important to note that both phones likely include low-resolution auxiliary cameras (e.g., macro, depth) that offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Snapdragon 778G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Infinix Note 10 Pro’s Helio G95 (12nm). The 778G features a more modern CPU architecture – a Cortex-A78 prime core versus the G95’s Cortex-A76 – and a more efficient manufacturing process. This results in a roughly 40% performance increase in CPU-intensive tasks and a significant boost in GPU performance. The A52s 5G also benefits from faster RAM speeds, likely LPDDR4X versus the Note 10 Pro’s likely LPDDR4. This translates to snappier app loading and smoother multitasking. The 6nm process also means better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Infinix Note 10 Pro claims an endurance rating of 128 hours, while the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G manages 113 hours. This suggests the Note 10 Pro offers longer battery life on a single charge. However, the A52s 5G’s more efficient Snapdragon 778G chipset partially offsets this difference. The Note 10 Pro supports 33W wired charging, allowing for faster top-ups compared to the A52s 5G’s 25W charging. While the Note 10 Pro wins on raw endurance, the A52s 5G’s faster processor means less time waiting for tasks to complete, potentially reducing the need for frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 10 Pro if you absolutely prioritize maximizing battery life and are less concerned with demanding applications or 5G connectivity. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and make calls. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value a smoother user experience, faster processing speeds for gaming and multitasking, and future-proof 5G support. It’s the better option for power users and those who want a phone that will remain responsive for years to come.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Helio G95 in the Infinix Note 10 Pro struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Helio G95 can run PUBG and Call of Duty, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. The Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G offers a significantly better gaming experience, allowing for higher settings and more stable performance.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Infinix Note 10 Pro with its 33W support compared to the A52s 5G's 25W?
While 33W is faster, the difference isn't massive. The Note 10 Pro will likely charge from 0-100% in around 60-75 minutes, while the A52s 5G will take closer to 80-90 minutes. The A52s 5G's more efficient chipset also means it may not require as frequent full charges.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G actually useful if I don't have widespread 5G coverage in my area?
Even without widespread 5G, the A52s 5G still benefits from improved 4G LTE performance due to its more modern modem. Furthermore, investing in a 5G-capable phone future-proofs your purchase as 5G networks continue to expand.
