Infinix Note 10 Pro vs Oppo Reno 5G: A Detailed Comparison for Gamers and Value Seekers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery and casual gaming, the Infinix Note 10 Pro is the clear winner. Its 128-hour endurance rating and 33W charging significantly outperform the Oppo Reno 5G. However, the Reno 5G’s Snapdragon 855 offers a performance edge for demanding tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 10 Pro | Oppo Reno 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 78 NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 12 | 2019, April. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 07 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.8 x 78.3 x 7.8 mm (6.80 x 3.08 x 0.31 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.09" | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, Nordic Secret | Ocean Green, Jet Black |
| Models | X695, X695D | CPH1921 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 880 EUR |
| SAR | 0.61 W/kg (head) 0.22 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 128h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Loudspeaker | -25.3 LUFS (Very good) | - |
Infinix Note 10 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (128h endurance)
- Fast 33W charging
- Aggressive price point
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 855
- Display brightness could be better
Oppo Reno 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 855 processor
- Potentially better display calibration
- Refined user experience (typical of Oppo)
- Slower 20W charging
- Likely shorter battery life
Display Comparison
The Infinix Note 10 Pro features a display capable of 447 nits of peak brightness, offering adequate visibility outdoors. While the contrast ratio of 1326:1 is respectable, it doesn't match the color accuracy often found in Oppo's displays (though specific Oppo Reno 5G display specs are unavailable). The Reno 5G likely benefits from Oppo’s established display calibration expertise, potentially offering more vibrant and accurate colors. However, without specific data on the Reno 5G’s panel, the Infinix’s brightness is a quantifiable advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, the market positioning suggests the Oppo Reno 5G likely prioritizes image processing and software features, leveraging Oppo’s expertise in computational photography. The Infinix Note 10 Pro likely focuses on providing a versatile camera experience at a lower cost. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on the Infinix is a common, but often underwhelming, feature that adds little practical value.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno 5G’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm) is built on a smaller fabrication process than the Infinix Note 10 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm). This translates to better power efficiency and thermal management for the Snapdragon. The Snapdragon 855’s Kryo 485 cores, with a peak clock speed of 2.84 GHz, offer a performance advantage over the Helio G95’s 2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, particularly in sustained workloads. While the Helio G95 is optimized for gaming, the Snapdragon 855’s overall architecture provides a more robust foundation for multitasking and demanding applications. The Reno 5G’s GPU will also outperform the G95’s.
Battery Life
The Infinix Note 10 Pro boasts an impressive 128-hour endurance rating, indicating exceptional battery life. Coupled with 33W wired charging, it offers a compelling combination of longevity and quick top-ups. The Oppo Reno 5G, with its 20W charging, will take significantly longer to fully charge. While the Reno 5G’s battery capacity is unknown, the lower charging wattage suggests it won’t match the Infinix’s endurance, making the Note 10 Pro the clear winner for users who prioritize minimizing time spent plugged in.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 10 Pro if you need exceptional battery life, enjoy mobile gaming without breaking the bank, and prioritize value for money. Buy the Oppo Reno 5G if you prefer a more refined user experience, require slightly more processing power for demanding applications, and are willing to trade some battery life for that performance boost.