The Infinix Hot 9 and Oppo A53s 5G represent two distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The Hot 9, leveraging the older Helio A25, aims for extreme affordability, while the A53s 5G brings 5G connectivity and a more modern chipset, the Dimensity 700, to a still-accessible price point. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A53s 5G is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset provides a significantly faster and more responsive experience, coupled with the benefit of 5G connectivity. While the Hot 9 offers a lower entry price, the A53s 5G’s performance gains justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 23. Released 2020, April | 2021, April 27 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, May 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 165.4 x 76.8 x 8.8 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 164 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 189.6 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 10, XOS 6.0 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Triple-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 13 MP, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses
or
16 MP, (wide), PDAF (64/128 GB models only)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Quetzal Cyan, Violet, Ocean Wave | Crystal Blue, Ink Black |
| Models | X655C, X655, X655D | CPH2321 |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 170 EUR |
Infinix Hot 9
- Lowest possible price point
- Potentially longer standby time due to simpler features
- May be more readily available in certain markets
- Significantly slower performance
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Poor gaming performance
Oppo A53s 5G
- Faster and more responsive performance
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- More efficient chipset for better battery life
- Slightly higher price
- Slow 10W charging
- May not be available in all regions
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the provided data, a direct comparison is limited. However, considering the market segment, both likely feature LCD panels. The A53s 5G, being a newer device, *may* benefit from slightly improved color accuracy and brightness. The Hot 9’s display is likely optimized for power efficiency, given the less powerful chipset, potentially at the expense of vibrancy. Bezels are expected to be noticeable on both, typical for this price range.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume the Oppo A53s 5G benefits from more advanced image processing capabilities thanks to its newer chipset. While both likely feature a primary camera, the A53s 5G’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Dimensity 700 will likely deliver better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality. The prevalence of low-resolution auxiliary cameras (often 2MP) in this segment suggests focusing on the primary sensor’s performance is key, and the A53s 5G likely has an edge here.
Performance
The performance gap between these two is substantial. The Oppo A53s 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700, built on a 7nm process, is a generational leap over the Infinix Hot 9’s 12nm Mediatek Helio A25. The Dimensity 700’s CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – offers significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance compared to the Hot 9’s 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53. This translates to faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. The Dimensity 700 also includes a more capable GPU, further widening the performance divide. The Hot 9 will struggle with demanding applications and may exhibit noticeable lag.
Battery Life
The battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but given the market positioning, both likely fall in the 4000-5000 mAh range. The key difference lies in efficiency. The Dimensity 700’s 7nm process is significantly more power-efficient than the Helio A25’s 12nm process. This means the A53s 5G will likely offer comparable or even better battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity. The A53s 5G’s 10W charging is slow by modern standards, but the more efficient chipset means it may not need to be charged as frequently.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 9 if you absolutely need the lowest possible price and your primary use case revolves around basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media. You’re willing to compromise on performance and future-proofing. Buy the Oppo A53s 5G if you prioritize a smoother user experience, faster app loading times, and the ability to take advantage of 5G networks, even if it means spending a bit more upfront.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A53s 5G’s Dimensity 700 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Dimensity 700 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with a stable frame rate. While it won’t deliver the highest graphical fidelity, it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Helio A25 in the Infinix Hot 9, which would likely struggle even at the lowest settings.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Oppo A53s 5G actually useful if 5G coverage is limited in my area?
Even with limited 5G coverage, the Oppo A53s 5G benefits from the Dimensity 700’s advanced modem technology, which can improve 4G LTE performance and signal reception. Furthermore, investing in a 5G-capable device future-proofs you as 5G networks expand.
❓ How much slower will app loading times be on the Infinix Hot 9 compared to the Oppo A53s 5G?
Expect app loading times on the Infinix Hot 9 to be noticeably slower – potentially 2-3 times longer – due to the Helio A25’s weaker CPU and slower storage access speeds. This difference will be particularly apparent with larger, more complex applications.
