The Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ and Realme C55 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver value, they take distinctly different approaches: the Infinix prioritizes raw processing power with the newer Helio G200, while the Realme C55 emphasizes efficient endurance and a refined user experience. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and fast charging, the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Helio G200 chipset and 45W charging significantly outperform the Realme C55’s Helio G88 and 33W charging. However, the Realme C55 offers respectable battery life and a more balanced overall package for those seeking longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 10 | 2023, March 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 13 | Available. Released 2023, March 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back or silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 6 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.24 in) | 165.6 x 75.9 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 155 g (5.47 oz) | 189.5 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | - |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2720 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz, 2160Hz PWM, 700 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 (1.1GHz) | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, XOS 15.1 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 22 min
10W reverse wired
Bypass charging | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min |
| Type | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sleek Black, Titanium Silver, Coral Tides, Misty Violet, Sonic Yellow, Moco Cyber Green | Sun Shower, Rainy Night, Rainforest |
| Models | X6886 | RMX3710 |
| Price | - | ₹ 8,399 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1264:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-31.8 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 257263 (v9)
GeekBench: 1452 (v5.1), 1413 (v6)
GFXBench: 9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
- Faster Processor (Helio G200)
- Significantly Brighter Display
- Faster Charging (45W)
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Slightly Shorter Battery Life (based on active use)
- Limited Camera Information
Realme C55
- Excellent Battery Endurance
- More Efficient Chipset (Helio G88)
- Potentially Better Camera Features
- Refined User Experience
- Slower Processor (Helio G88)
- Dimmer Display
- Slower Charging (33W)
Display Comparison
The Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1650 nits, compared to the Realme C55’s 659 nits. This translates to vastly superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Realme C55’s 1264:1 contrast ratio is respectable, the difference in peak brightness is the defining factor. The Infinix’s brighter panel will provide a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience, especially for multimedia consumption. We lack data on panel type for either device, but given the price point, both likely utilize IPS LCD technology.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Realme C55’s inclusion of a dedicated camera module suggests a greater emphasis on photography features, even if the quality of the 2MP macro lens is questionable. The Infinix Hot 60 Pro+’s camera performance will likely rely heavily on software processing to compensate for potentially less advanced hardware. We need more data to determine a clear winner in this category.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Helio G200 (6nm), featuring a more modern CPU architecture with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Realme C55 employs the older Helio G88 (12nm) with 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 6nm process node of the G200 offers improved power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 12nm G88. This means the Infinix is likely to sustain higher performance for longer periods without throttling. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural improvements in the G200 give the Infinix a clear advantage in processing power.
Battery Life
The Realme C55 has an endurance rating of 123 hours, indicating strong battery life. The Infinix Hot 60 Pro+, in active use, achieves 11:11h, which translates to a full day of moderate use. While the Realme C55’s endurance rating suggests longer standby times, the Infinix compensates with significantly faster charging. Its 45W wired charging can reach 50% in just 22 minutes, while the Realme C55 takes 29 minutes. The Infinix also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Realme C55, adding to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ if you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. You’ll benefit from the more modern chipset and brighter display. Buy the Realme C55 if you prefer a phone that prioritizes all-day battery life and a more conservative, efficient power profile. It’s ideal for everyday use and users who don’t push their phones to the limit.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+’s Helio G200 chipset get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Helio G200’s 6nm process node is designed for improved thermal efficiency compared to the 12nm Helio G88 in the Realme C55. While some heat generation is inevitable during gaming, the G200 is less prone to significant throttling, allowing for more sustained performance. However, sustained peak performance will still generate heat, and the phone's cooling solution will play a role.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Realme C55 fast enough for quick top-ups throughout the day?
While 33W charging isn’t the fastest available, it’s adequate for topping up the battery during short breaks. Reaching 50% charge in 29 minutes is reasonable, but it’s noticeably slower than the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+’s 45W charging. If you frequently need to quickly replenish your battery, the Infinix is the better choice.
❓ How does the display brightness difference impact outdoor usability?
The 1650 nits peak brightness of the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ makes a substantial difference in outdoor visibility, especially under direct sunlight. The Realme C55’s 659 nits display will struggle in bright conditions, requiring you to seek shade or increase brightness, which will further drain the battery. The Infinix offers a far more comfortable viewing experience outdoors.
