The Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ and Honor X6a represent compelling options in the crowded sub-$200 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, they take different approaches to performance and battery life. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ emerges as the stronger contender. Its Helio G200 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, and 45W charging significantly outperform the Honor X6a’s Helio G36 and 22.5W charging, making it ideal for gamers and power users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 10 | 2023, July 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 13 | Available. Released 2023, July 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back or silicone polymer (eco leather) back | - |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 6 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.24 in) | 163.3 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 155 g (5.47 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | - |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2720 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz, 2160Hz PWM, 700 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | TFT LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 (1.1GHz) | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, XOS 15.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, MagicOS 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 22 min
10W reverse wired
Bypass charging | 22.5W wired, 31% in 20 min |
| Type | 5160 mAh | Li-Po 5200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sleek Black, Titanium Silver, Coral Tides, Misty Violet, Sonic Yellow, Moco Cyber Green | Cyan Lake, Midnight Black |
| Models | X6886 | WDY-LX1, WDY-LX2 |
| Price | - | About 150 EUR |
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
- Faster 45W charging significantly reduces downtime.
- More powerful Helio G200 chipset for smoother performance.
- Brighter display enhances outdoor visibility.
- Specific battery capacity is unknown.
- Software experience may vary based on Infinix’s UI.
Honor X6a
- Potentially more streamlined software experience.
- Competitive price point.
- Reliable performance for basic tasks.
- Slower 22.5W charging.
- Less powerful Helio G36 chipset.
- Dimmer display may struggle in bright sunlight.
Display Comparison
The Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1650 nits. This is a substantial advantage over what we’d expect from the Honor X6a, making the Infinix more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While panel technology details are missing for both, the higher brightness of the Infinix suggests a more advanced panel. Bezels are likely comparable given the price point, and color accuracy will likely be similar, relying on standard IPS LCD characteristics.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the main sensors, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset’s image signal processor (ISP) plays a crucial role. The Helio G200 in the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ likely offers more advanced image processing capabilities than the Helio G36 in the Honor X6a. This could result in better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of information regarding sensor size and aperture makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the chipset advantage leans towards the Infinix.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Helio G200, fabricated on a 6nm process, featuring a more modern CPU architecture with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Honor X6a, conversely, employs the Helio G36, built on a less efficient 12nm process, and utilizes older Cortex-A53 cores (4x2.2 GHz & 4x1.7 GHz). This architectural difference translates to a clear performance advantage for the Infinix, particularly in multi-threaded tasks and gaming. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended use. While RAM details are missing, the chipset difference is the dominant factor.
Battery Life
The Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ delivers a compelling battery and charging experience. It achieves an active use score of 11:11h, and supports 45W wired charging, reaching 50% charge in just 22 minutes. The Honor X6a’s 22.5W charging is significantly slower, taking 20 minutes to reach only 31%. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging speed of the Infinix, combined with its respectable active use time, provides a more convenient user experience. The Infinix also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the Honor X6a.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games and applications with less throttling, and if minimizing charging time is a priority. Buy the Honor X6a if you prefer a simpler user experience and are less concerned with peak performance or rapid charging, focusing instead on a reliable, everyday smartphone.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+’s Helio G200 chipset get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Helio G200’s 6nm process is more efficient than the 12nm process used in the Honor X6a’s Helio G36. This improved efficiency translates to lower heat generation, reducing the likelihood of significant throttling during extended gaming. However, sustained high loads will still generate heat, and performance may decrease slightly over time.
❓ How does the 45W charging on the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ compare to the 22.5W charging on the Honor X6a in real-world use?
The Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ charges significantly faster. Reaching 50% charge in 22 minutes versus 31% in 20 minutes for the Honor X6a demonstrates a substantial difference. This means less time tethered to a charger and more time using the phone, especially beneficial for users who frequently run out of battery.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture (Cortex-A76 vs Cortex-A53) noticeable in everyday tasks?
Yes, the Cortex-A76 cores in the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ are significantly more powerful than the Cortex-A53 cores in the Honor X6a. While both phones will handle basic tasks like browsing and social media adequately, the Infinix will feel snappier and more responsive when multitasking or launching demanding applications.
