The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Infinix Hot 60 Pro and vivo Y35+ are two contenders vying for your attention. Both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The Hot 60 Pro prioritizes rapid charging, while the Y35+ leverages a more efficient chipset. This comparison dives deep into the specs to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing quick top-ups and don't mind potentially slightly lower sustained performance, the Infinix Hot 60 Pro is the better choice thanks to its 45W charging. However, the vivo Y35+ offers a more efficient chipset and a potentially smoother overall experience for everyday tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 10 | 2023, May 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 13 | Available. Released 2023, May 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.9 x 6.6 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.26 in) | 164.1 x 76.2 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | - |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2720 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz, 2160Hz PWM, 700 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 550 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 (1.1GHz) | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, XOS 15.1 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
VGA |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.6, 27mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, 24mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 22 min
10W reverse wired | 15W wired
Reverse wired |
| Type | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sleek Black, Titanium Silver, Coral Tides, Sapphire Blue, Jungle Breath, Orange Rose Valley | Black, Blue, Violet |
| Models | X6885 | - |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 240 EUR |
Infinix Hot 60 Pro
- Significantly faster 45W charging
- Potential for higher peak performance in short bursts
- Reverse wired charging for accessories
- Less efficient chipset may lead to throttling
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to the Y35+
vivo Y35+
- More efficient Dimensity 6020 chipset
- Potentially smoother sustained performance
- Better thermal management
- Slower 15W charging
- May not be ideal for extended gaming sessions
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to feature LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The key difference lies under the hood. While specific display specs are missing, the focus here is on processing power, not visual fidelity. Expect 60Hz refresh rates on both, and color accuracy will likely be standard for the segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both phones targeting the budget segment. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make definitive claims. However, the inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on both devices suggests limited utility; these sensors often produce underwhelming results. The primary sensor’s quality and image processing algorithms will be the deciding factors, and without further data, it’s a toss-up. Expect adequate performance in good lighting conditions, but struggles in low-light scenarios.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The vivo Y35+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 6020, fabricated on a 7nm process. This smaller node generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the Infinix Hot 60 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G200 (6nm). Both CPUs share the same core configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – meaning raw clock speed isn’t a differentiator. The 7nm process of the Dimensity 6020 should allow for sustained performance during longer gaming sessions with less throttling. The G200, while capable, may exhibit more thermal limitations. The Y35+’s efficiency advantage will also impact battery life.
Battery Life
The Infinix Hot 60 Pro’s 45W charging is a significant advantage. It promises a 50% charge in just 22 minutes, a substantial time saving compared to the vivo Y35+'s 15W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the Hot 60 Pro mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Dimensity 6020’s efficiency in the Y35+ will contribute to longer battery life, but topping up will take considerably more time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 60 Pro if you frequently find yourself needing to quickly recharge your phone and value speed over absolute peak performance. It's ideal for users who game in short bursts or rely heavily on streaming. Buy the vivo Y35+ if you prefer a more balanced experience with a focus on efficiency and consistent performance for daily tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. It's a better fit for users who prioritize battery life and a smoother user interface.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Mediatek Helio G200 in the Infinix Hot 60 Pro struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio G200 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The 7nm Dimensity 6020 in the Y35+ will offer a smoother experience with less throttling during extended gaming sessions, allowing for potentially higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 45W charging on the Infinix Hot 60 Pro compared to the 15W charging on the vivo Y35+ in real-world use?
The 45W charging on the Hot 60 Pro can add a significant amount of charge in a short time. While a full 0-100% time isn't specified, the claim of 50% in 22 minutes is substantially faster than the Y35+'s 15W charging, which will likely take over 2 hours for a full charge.
❓ Does the vivo Y35+’s Dimensity 6020 chipset offer noticeable improvements in app loading times and multitasking compared to the Infinix Hot 60 Pro?
Yes, the Dimensity 6020’s more efficient architecture should result in snappier app loading times and smoother multitasking. While both phones have the same CPU core configuration, the 7nm process gives the Dimensity 6020 an edge in overall responsiveness.
