The Infinix Hot 60 Pro and Honor X7a represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The Infinix prioritizes faster charging and a newer chipset, while the Honor focuses on a more established brand reputation and a slightly different processor configuration. This comparison will dissect their key specifications to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and significantly faster charging, the Infinix Hot 60 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Helio G200 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers a performance edge over the Honor X7a’s Helio G37. While the Honor X7a provides a reliable experience, the Infinix’s 45W charging and more modern architecture make it the better choice for demanding users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 10 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 13 | Available. Released 2023, January 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.9 x 6.6 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.26 in) | 167.5 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.59 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | - |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2720 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz, 2160Hz PWM, 700 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | TFT LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6765H Helio G37 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 (1.1GHz) | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, XOS 15.1 | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.6, 27mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, 24mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 22 min
10W reverse wired | 22.5W wired
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5160 mAh | Li-Po 5330 or 6000 mAh (market/region dependent) |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sleek Black, Titanium Silver, Coral Tides, Sapphire Blue, Jungle Breath, Orange Rose Valley | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black |
| Models | X6885 | RKY-LX1, RKY-LX2, RKY-LX3 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 120 EUR |
Infinix Hot 60 Pro
- Faster 45W charging significantly reduces downtime.
- More modern and efficient Mediatek Helio G200 chipset.
- Superior CPU architecture with Cortex-A76 cores.
- Brand recognition is lower than Honor.
- Detailed display specs are unknown.
Honor X7a
- Established brand reputation with Honor.
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks.
- Potentially better software optimization (brand dependent).
- Slower 22.5W charging.
- Older and less efficient Mediatek Helio G37 chipset.
- Less powerful CPU architecture with Cortex-A53 cores.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to feature LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, detailed display specs (resolution, brightness, color gamut) are missing. The focus here is on processing power, not visual fidelity. We can assume both will offer adequate viewing experiences for everyday tasks, but neither will compete with higher-end devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor and supporting lenses. However, the inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality. The primary sensor’s size and aperture will be the key determinants of camera performance, but this information is unavailable. Image processing algorithms will also play a crucial role, and brand-specific tuning will likely differentiate the two.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Hot 60 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G200 (6nm) is a more recent design than the Honor X7a’s Helio G37 (12nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance, meaning the G200 can sustain higher clock speeds for longer periods. The CPU configuration also favors the Infinix: Cortex-A76 cores (2x2.2 GHz) in the G200 are significantly more powerful than the Cortex-A53 cores (4x2.3 GHz) in the G37. While the G37 has a higher clock speed on its primary cores, the architectural advantage of the A76 cores in the G200 will translate to better real-world performance, especially in multi-threaded tasks and gaming. The G200’s Cortex-A55 efficiency cores (6x2.0 GHz) are also more efficient than the G37’s (4x1.7 GHz).
Battery Life
The Infinix Hot 60 Pro’s 45W charging is a significant advantage over the Honor X7a’s 22.5W charging. Infinix claims a 50% charge in 22 minutes, while the Honor X7a will take considerably longer. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the Infinix allows for quicker top-ups, mitigating any potential capacity differences. The Infinix also offers 10W reverse wired charging, compared to the Honor’s 5W, providing more versatile power sharing capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 60 Pro if you need a phone for moderate gaming, frequent fast charging, and appreciate a more modern chipset architecture. This phone is ideal for users who push their devices and value speed. Buy the Honor X7a if you prefer a phone from a well-established brand with a focus on consistent, everyday performance and a slightly more conservative power profile. It’s a solid choice for users who prioritize reliability over peak performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Infinix Hot 60 Pro’s Helio G200 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio G200, with its Cortex-A76 cores and 6nm process, is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings. While it won’t deliver flagship-level performance, it should provide a playable experience. The improved thermal efficiency of the 6nm node will also help prevent excessive throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 45W charging on the Infinix Hot 60 Pro compared to the Honor X7a’s 22.5W?
Infinix claims a 50% charge in 22 minutes with the 45W charger. The Honor X7a, with its 22.5W charger, will take significantly longer – likely over an hour to reach 50%. This difference is substantial and will be noticeable for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the Honor X7a benefit from Honor's software optimizations?
Honor has been focusing on improving its software experience with Magic UI. While the software experience is subjective, Honor’s optimizations *could* lead to smoother performance and better battery life compared to a less refined software experience. However, the hardware limitations of the Helio G37 will still be a factor.
