Infinix Hot 50i vs Xiaomi Poco C65: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Poco C65 emerges as the better choice. Its Helio G85 chipset, coupled with the measured 607 nits of brightness, provides a smoother experience and better visibility in outdoor conditions. However, the Infinix Hot 50i’s reverse wired charging is a unique feature.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Hot 50i | Xiaomi Poco C65 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 23 | 2023, November 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October | Available. Released 2023, November 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 77.1 x 8.1 mm (6.52 x 3.04 x 0.32 in) | 168 x 78 x 8.1 mm (6.61 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14, XOS 14.5 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired Reverse wired Bypass charging | 18W wired, PD |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sleek Black, Sage Green, Titanium Grey | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Models | X6531, X6531B | 2310FPCA4G, 2310FPCA4I |
| Price | - | € 99.95 / $ 139.99 / £ 115.99 / ₹ 8,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Infinix Hot 50i
- Unique reverse wired charging capability
- Bypass charging allows use while charging
- Potentially lower price point (depending on region)
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Potentially less efficient chipset (Helio G81)
- Missing battery capacity specification
Xiaomi Poco C65
- Brighter display (607 nits)
- More efficient chipset (Helio G85)
- Longer battery life (11:31h active use)
- Lacks reverse wired charging
- Standard 60Hz display refresh rate
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Poco C65 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 607 nits, compared to the Infinix Hot 50i which lacks published brightness data. This difference translates to superior readability under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Poco C65’s 1555:1 contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The absence of refresh rate information for both devices indicates a standard 60Hz panel, which is typical for this price segment, but limits smoothness during scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by the limited information provided. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and depth sensor, but specifics like sensor size and aperture are missing. The focus should be on real-world image quality, which is heavily influenced by software processing. Without sample images, it’s difficult to assess which device delivers superior photos. The presence of a 'Photo/Video' designation for the Poco C65 suggests a more versatile camera experience, but this is speculative. The absence of details regarding video recording capabilities further complicates the comparison.
Performance
Both the Infinix Hot 50i and Poco C65 are powered by Mediatek Helio G series chipsets. The Poco C65 utilizes the Helio G85 (12nm), while the Hot 50i features the Helio G81. While both CPUs share the same core configuration – 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 in the Poco C65 versus 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55 in the Hot 50i – the G85’s slightly higher Cortex-A55 clock speed and more efficient 12nm process should result in marginally better sustained performance and thermal management. This translates to potentially smoother multitasking and slightly longer gaming sessions before throttling occurs. The lack of RAM specifications for both devices makes a direct comparison difficult, but adequate RAM is crucial for overall responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Poco C65 demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, achieving an active use score of 11:31h. While the Infinix Hot 50i’s battery capacity is not specified, the Poco C65’s performance indicates a well-optimized power management system. Both devices support 18W wired charging, but the Poco C65 adds Power Delivery (PD) support, enabling faster charging with compatible chargers. The Hot 50i uniquely offers reverse wired charging, allowing it to function as a power bank for other devices, and bypass charging, which allows charging while in use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 50i if you need a phone with the flexibility of reverse wired charging to top up accessories or other devices. This is a niche feature rarely found in this price bracket. Buy the Xiaomi Poco C65 if you prioritize a more responsive user experience, better display visibility, and longer battery life during active use, as evidenced by its 11:31h score.