Infinix Hot 50 vs Motorola Moto G54: A Detailed Comparison of Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G54 emerges as the slightly better choice. While the Infinix Hot 50 offers a competitive package, the Moto G54’s Dimensity 7020 provides a noticeable performance edge in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming, justifying the small price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Hot 50 | Motorola Moto G54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 05 | 2023, September 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October | Available. Released 2023, September 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 77.1 x 7.8 mm (6.52 x 3.04 x 0.31 in) | 161.6 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 177 g (6.24 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 14, XOS 14.5 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) - InternationalmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - China |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF Auxiliary lenses | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 0.61µm, PDAF, OIS 2 MP (macro) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0" | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired Reverse wired | 15W wired Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Vibrant Blue, Sleek Black, Sage Green, Dreamy Purple | Midnight blue, Indigo blue, Glacier blue, Mint green |
| Models | X6720 | XT2343-1, XT2343-2 |
| Price | $ 192.96 / £ 184.93 / ₹ 10,999 | € 147.00 / $ 189.99 / £ 161.57 |
Infinix Hot 50
- Slightly faster wired charging (18W)
- Reverse wired charging for accessories
- Potentially lower price point
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 6300)
- Likely lower single-core performance
Motorola Moto G54
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 7020)
- Improved CPU performance with Cortex-A78 cores
- Potentially better image processing
- Slower wired charging (15W)
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize 6nm chips, suggesting similar power efficiency, but the display details are missing. Assuming both use IPS LCD panels (typical for this price bracket), the key differentiator will be peak brightness and color accuracy. Without specific nit ratings, it's difficult to declare a winner. However, Motorola generally calibrates its displays for more natural colors, while Infinix often leans towards more vibrant, saturated tones, which may appeal to some users.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information beyond the presence of a macro lens (which is generally low quality on both), it’s challenging to make a definitive judgment. However, the chipset’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) plays a significant role. The Dimensity 7020 in the Moto G54 likely has a more advanced ISP, enabling better noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of OIS on either device means image stabilization will rely heavily on software processing, where the 7020’s ISP could again provide an edge.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G54’s Mediatek Dimensity 7020 holds a clear advantage over the Infinix Hot 50’s Dimensity 6300. While both are 6nm chips, the 7020 features Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, a step up from the Hot 50’s 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. The A78 architecture offers improved IPC (Instructions Per Clock) resulting in faster single-core performance, crucial for app launch speeds and general responsiveness. The 6300’s higher clock speed on the A76 cores won’t fully compensate for this architectural difference. This translates to a smoother experience when switching between apps and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Moto G54.
Battery Life
Both phones offer reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories. The Infinix Hot 50’s 18W charging is slightly faster than the Moto G54’s 15W, potentially shaving off some time during a full charge. However, the actual charging time difference will be minimal in real-world use. Battery capacity is not specified, but the efficiency of the Dimensity 7020 in the Moto G54 could offset a potentially smaller battery size, resulting in comparable all-day battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 50 if you prioritize a slightly lower upfront cost and appreciate the inclusion of reverse wired charging for topping up accessories. Buy the Motorola Moto G54 if you value smoother multitasking, a more responsive gaming experience, and a chipset with a bit more headroom for future software updates.