The Infinix Hot 40 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A55 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Hot 40 Pro aggressively targets gamers with its Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, while the Galaxy A55 aims for a more balanced experience with Samsung’s Exynos 1480, focusing on all-around usability and a premium feel. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a polished experience, reliable software updates, and a brighter display, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the better choice. However, gamers and those seeking maximum battery life on a tighter budget will find the Infinix Hot 40 Pro a compelling alternative.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 05 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 168.6 x 76.6 x 8.3 mm (6.64 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 13, XOS 13.5 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.15", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 20-75% in 35 min
Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Palm Blue, Horizon Gold, Starlit Black, Starfall Green, Free Fire | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | X6837 | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | £ 179.95 / € 226.31 | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Infinix Hot 40 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (12:56h active use)
- Faster charging speed (33W)
- More affordable price point
- Less powerful chipset (Helio G99)
- Dimmer display (534 nits)
- Less refined software experience
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Brighter display (1010 nits)
- More powerful chipset (Exynos 1480)
- Superior software support and updates
- Slightly shorter battery life (13:27h active use)
- Slower charging speed (25W)
- Higher price
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 1010 nits compared to the Infinix Hot 40 Pro’s 534 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Infinix offers a respectable 1822:1 contrast ratio, the A55’s panel likely benefits from Samsung’s color science, resulting in more accurate and vibrant colors. The A55’s higher peak brightness is particularly beneficial for HDR content viewing, something the Hot 40 Pro will struggle with. We expect the A55 to have a higher quality panel overall, despite lacking specific panel tech details in the provided data.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung generally excels in image processing, and we can anticipate the Galaxy A55 to deliver more consistent and refined photos, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes makes it difficult to assess low-light performance, but Samsung’s larger R&D budget typically translates to better image quality. The Infinix Hot 40 Pro’s camera is likely focused on providing acceptable results for social media sharing, while the A55 aims for a more versatile and higher-quality photographic experience. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on the Hot 40 Pro is likely a marketing feature with limited practical benefit.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480 (4nm) chipset represents a clear architectural advantage over the Infinix Hot 40 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm). The Exynos 1480 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.75 GHz, offering significantly higher single-core performance than the G99’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. This difference will be noticeable in demanding tasks like video editing and app loading. The 4nm process node of the Exynos 1480 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. While the G99 is capable for gaming, the A55 will provide a smoother and more consistent experience, especially in graphically intensive titles.
Battery Life
The Infinix Hot 40 Pro demonstrates superior battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 12:56h compared to the Samsung Galaxy A55’s 13:27h. This suggests the more efficient Helio G99 chipset and potentially optimized software contribute to longer runtimes. However, the A55 compensates with a faster charging speed of 25W, while the Hot 40 Pro is limited to 33W. The Hot 40 Pro’s 35-minute 20-75% charge time is competitive, but the A55’s charging speed, while slower overall, may be more convenient for quick top-ups. The Hot 40 Pro also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the A55.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 40 Pro if you need exceptional battery life for extended gaming sessions and prioritize raw performance-per-dollar. You’ll benefit from its efficient Helio G99 chipset and fast charging. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a more refined user experience, a brighter and more vibrant display, and the peace of mind that comes with Samsung’s software support and build quality. It’s the better option for everyday use and content consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1480 in the Galaxy A55 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1480, built on a 4nm process, is generally efficient and well-managed in terms of thermals. While it may get warm during extended gaming, it's unlikely to experience significant throttling like some older Exynos chips. Samsung’s thermal management system is typically effective at maintaining stable performance.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Infinix Hot 40 Pro significantly faster in real-world use compared to the 25W on the A55?
While 33W is numerically higher, the difference in charging speed isn't dramatic. The Infinix Hot 40 Pro can charge from 20-75% in 35 minutes, which is competitive. However, the A55’s optimized charging algorithms may close the gap, and the convenience of a more widely compatible charging standard should be considered.
❓ How does the Helio G99 handle demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact on the Infinix Hot 40 Pro?
The Helio G99 can run PUBG and Genshin Impact, but you’ll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. Expect medium settings to be the sweet spot for a playable experience. The Exynos 1480 in the A55 will provide a noticeably smoother experience at higher settings.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A55 have a high PWM dimming frequency, and is it suitable for users sensitive to screen flicker?
While specific PWM frequency data isn't provided, Samsung typically employs higher PWM frequencies in their AMOLED displays, making them generally more comfortable for users sensitive to flicker. This is an area where the A55 likely has an advantage over the Hot 40 Pro, though further testing would be needed to confirm.
