The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Infinix Hot 20 5G and Xiaomi Poco M5 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you determine which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco M5 edges out the Hot 20 5G thanks to its exceptional battery life and slightly better display. However, the Hot 20 5G's 5G connectivity is a significant advantage for those seeking future-proofed performance and faster data speeds. It's a close call, depending on your priorities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 06 | 2022, September 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 06 | Available. Released 2022, September 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.3 x 76.5 x 8.9 mm (6.55 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, XOS 10.6 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (except 64/4 option) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
5W reverse wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Racing Black, Space Blue, Blaster Green | Black, Green, Yellow |
| Models | X666, X666B | 22071219CG |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.04 W/kg (head) 0.83 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.83 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 121h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1363:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 386311 (v9)
GeekBench: 1896 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Hot 20 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- Slightly better performance (Dimensity 810)
- Modern chipset
- Likely lower display brightness
- Potentially shorter battery life
- Camera performance likely average
Xiaomi Poco M5
- Exceptional battery life
- Vibrant display (higher brightness)
- Reliable all-around performance
- No 5G connectivity
- Helio G99 chipset slightly less powerful
- Camera performance likely average
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, but the Poco M5 boasts a slightly higher measured brightness of 448 nits compared to the Hot 20 5G's likely lower brightness (typical for this price range). The contrast ratio of 1363:1 on both is excellent, promising deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Poco M5's display might offer a marginally better viewing experience, especially in brighter environments.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely similar on both devices, offering decent image quality in good lighting conditions. Both feature standard camera setups with a primary sensor and likely ultrawide and macro lenses. Low-light performance will be average on both. Detailed camera testing would be needed to definitively declare a winner, but expect comparable results.
Performance
The Infinix Hot 20 5G's Dimensity 810 chipset generally outperforms the Poco M5's Helio G99 in multi-core benchmarks and sustained performance. While both utilize octa-core architectures with similar core configurations, the Dimensity 810's 6nm process and slightly higher clock speeds give it an edge. Gaming performance is comparable, but the Dimensity 810 handles more demanding titles slightly better. The 5G connectivity on the Hot 20 5G is a major differentiator.
Battery Life
The Poco M5 shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 121 hours is exceptional, suggesting significantly longer battery life than the Hot 20 5G. While both offer 18W wired charging, the Poco M5's larger battery capacity allows it to last much longer between charges.
Buying Guide
The Infinix Hot 20 5G is ideal for users who prioritize 5G connectivity and a smoother online experience. The Xiaomi Poco M5 is a great choice for those who value long battery life, a vibrant display, and a reliable all-around performer.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Infinix Hot 20 5G worth it if I don't need 5G?
If you don't need 5G, the Xiaomi Poco M5 is likely a better choice due to its superior battery life and slightly better display. The Poco M5 offers more value for money in that scenario.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Infinix Hot 20 5G has a slight edge in gaming due to its more powerful Dimensity 810 chipset, but both phones can handle most games at reasonable settings.
