Infinix Hot 20 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A23 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Infinix Hot 20 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 810 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge over the Snapdragon 695 in the Galaxy A23 5G, making it better suited for gaming and demanding applications. While the A23 5G offers Samsung’s brand recognition and a slightly brighter display, the Hot 20 5G’s superior processing power justifies the trade-off.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Hot 20 5G | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 30, 66, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 06 | 2022, August 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 06 | Available. Released 2022, September 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.3 x 76.5 x 8.9 mm (6.55 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits | PLS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, XOS 10.6 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - USA 8 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - International |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (except 64/4 option) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired 5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Racing Black, Space Blue, Blaster Green | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | X666, X666B | SM-A236U, SM-A236U1, SM-A236B, SM-A236B/DS, SM-A236B/DSN, SM-A236E, SM-S236DL |
| Price | About 240 EUR | $ 84.44 / £ 129.00 / € 125.28 / ₹ 21,000 |
| SAR | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.57 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.49 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 138h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1328:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 318821 (v9) GeekBench: 1940 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Hot 20 5G
- Stronger processor (Dimensity 810) for better performance
- 5W reverse wired charging for accessory top-ups
- Potentially more aggressive pricing
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Less established brand reputation
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- Brighter display (508 nits) for outdoor visibility
- Faster charging (25W)
- Samsung’s One UI software and brand recognition
- Less powerful processor (Snapdragon 695)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Both the Infinix Hot 20 5G and Samsung Galaxy A23 5G feature displays with a 1328:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar image quality in terms of dynamic range. However, the Galaxy A23 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 508 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the unmeasured brightness of the Hot 20 5G. While both likely utilize LCD panels, the A23 5G’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor use. The lack of high refresh rate support on either device is a common compromise at this price point.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without knowing sensor sizes or aperture values, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the price bracket, it’s likely both rely on primary sensors around the 50MP mark. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on the A23 5G is a common, but often underwhelming, feature. Image processing will likely differ, with Samsung’s software prioritizing vibrant colors and the Infinix potentially leaning towards a more natural look. Without sample images, it’s difficult to assess which device delivers superior image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Hot 20 5G is powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm), featuring a CPU configuration of 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. The Dimensity 810’s higher clocked Cortex-A76 cores generally translate to better single-core performance, crucial for app launch speeds and general responsiveness. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 810 typically exhibits a performance advantage in benchmarks and real-world gaming scenarios. The RAM configuration is not specified, but the chipset difference is the dominant factor.
Battery Life
Both the Infinix Hot 20 5G and Samsung Galaxy A23 5G share an endurance rating of 138 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. The Galaxy A23 5G supports 25W wired charging, significantly faster than the Hot 20 5G’s 18W charging. This means the A23 5G can replenish its battery more quickly, reducing downtime. The Hot 20 5G does offer 5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories, which the A23 5G lacks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 20 5G if you prioritize performance and responsiveness for gaming or multitasking. Its Dimensity 810 chipset delivers a smoother experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G if you value brand reliability, a slightly brighter screen for outdoor visibility, and prefer Samsung’s One UI software ecosystem, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.