Google Pixel 6a vs. Infinix Hot 20 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6a is the superior choice, offering a significantly faster processor, a brighter and more refined display, and Google’s renowned camera software. However, the Infinix Hot 20 5G provides a compelling option for those prioritizing 5G connectivity on a very tight budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Hot 20 5G | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 06 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 06 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.3 x 76.5 x 8.9 mm (6.55 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 12, XOS 10.6 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (except 64/4 option) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired 5W reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Racing Black, Space Blue, Blaster Green | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | X666, X666B | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 240 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Infinix Hot 20 5G
- Superior processor performance with Google Tensor
- Brighter and more accurate display
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing
- Higher price point
- No expandable storage
Google Pixel 6a
- Affordable price point
- 5G connectivity
- Reverse wired charging
- Less powerful processor
- Inferior display quality
- Less refined camera performance
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 876 nits, compared to an unstated brightness for the Infinix Hot 20 5G. This translates to better visibility outdoors. While both likely utilize OLED panels (based on the Pixel 6a’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio), the Pixel 6a’s superior brightness and color calibration provide a more vibrant and accurate viewing experience. The lack of high refresh rate on either device is a compromise at this price point, but the Pixel 6a’s panel quality is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s camera prowess is largely attributed to Google’s computational photography. While sensor sizes aren’t specified, the Pixel 6a’s image processing pipeline consistently delivers excellent dynamic range and detail. The Infinix Hot 20 5G likely relies more heavily on hardware, but without the software optimization of the Pixel. The absence of OIS on the Infinix is a disadvantage in low-light conditions. The Pixel 6a’s focus on software optimization makes it the clear winner for photography enthusiasts.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Infinix Hot 20 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 810 (6nm). Tensor’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.80 GHz, delivers significantly faster single-core performance, crucial for app launch speeds and responsiveness. While the Dimensity 810 is capable for everyday tasks, the Tensor chip excels in AI-driven features like image processing and voice recognition. The 5nm fabrication process of the Tensor also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting the slightly smaller battery capacity.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 94 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities. However, the Pixel 6a benefits from the more efficient Google Tensor chip. Both support 18W wired charging, but the Pixel 6a adds PD3.0 support, potentially allowing for faster charging with compatible chargers. The 5W reverse wired charging on the Infinix Hot 20 5G is a niche feature for emergency top-ups of other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 20 5G if you absolutely need 5G connectivity and are constrained by a budget under $200. It’s a practical choice for basic smartphone tasks and streaming. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you value performance, camera quality, and a smoother user experience, and are willing to spend more for a device that will last longer and handle demanding applications with ease.