The Infinix Hot 11s and Samsung Galaxy A22 occupy a similar price bracket, targeting users seeking a balance between affordability and functionality. However, they approach this goal with slightly different philosophies. The Hot 11s leans towards gaming performance, while the Galaxy A22 prioritizes a more refined user experience and display quality. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the best fit.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a brighter, more visually appealing display and the Samsung brand reputation, the Galaxy A22 is the better choice. However, gamers and those needing a slight performance edge will find the Infinix Hot 11s offers more bang for their buck, despite a less impressive screen.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 17 | 2021, June 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 21 | Available. Released 2021, July 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.9 x 77 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 159.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | NEG Dinorex T2X-1 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2480 pixels (~399 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~274 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 600 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Polar Black, Green Wave, Purple | Black, White, Mint, Violet |
| Models | X6812, X6812B | SM-A225F, SM-A225F/DS, SM-A225M, SM-A225M/DS |
| Price | About 140 EUR | € 193.97 / £ 160.00 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 121h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.6 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 185358 (v8), 165959 (v9)
GeekBench: 5464 (v4.4), 1372 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Hot 11s
- Slightly better gaming performance due to Helio G88
- Potentially more aggressive pricing
- Similar battery life to the A22
- Display brightness and quality likely inferior to the A22
- Less established brand reputation
- Charging speed unspecified
Samsung Galaxy A22
- Brighter and higher-quality display (597 nits)
- Samsung brand recognition and software support
- 15W fast charging
- Slightly lower gaming performance compared to the Hot 11s
- Potentially higher price
- Similar battery life to the Hot 11s
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A22 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 597 nits, compared to the Infinix Hot 11s (brightness data unavailable). This makes the A22 far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While both phones likely utilize LCD panels given their price point, the A22’s higher brightness and 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggest better overall image quality. The Hot 11s’ display specifications are less detailed, making a direct comparison of color accuracy and viewing angles difficult, but it’s reasonable to assume the A22 offers a superior visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. It’s likely both phones rely on similar budget image sensors. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices suggests limited utility, as these sensors typically produce low-quality images. Image processing will likely be a key differentiator, with Samsung’s software generally offering more refined results, though this is speculative without sample images. The A22’s brighter display will also aid in framing shots and reviewing photos.
Performance
Both the Infinix Hot 11s and Samsung Galaxy A22 are powered by Mediatek Helio G series chipsets, but the Hot 11s utilizes the Helio G88 while the A22 features the Helio G80. Both chipsets share the same CPU configuration – an octa-core setup with 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – meaning CPU-bound tasks will perform similarly. The G88’s advantage lies in its slightly higher GPU clock speed, offering a marginal improvement in gaming performance. However, the real-world difference is unlikely to be substantial. Both phones will likely struggle with demanding titles at high settings, but the Hot 11s may maintain slightly higher frame rates.
Battery Life
Both the Infinix Hot 11s and Samsung Galaxy A22 achieve an endurance rating of 121 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. The A22 supports 15W wired charging, while the Hot 11s’ charging speed is unspecified. Given the similar battery capacities (assumed to be around 5000mAh based on market segment), the A22’s 15W charging will likely result in faster 0-100% charge times. However, the identical endurance ratings suggest that real-world battery performance will be largely similar, lasting a full day for moderate users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 11s if you need a phone primarily for mobile gaming and demand the most processing power within a tight budget. Its Helio G88 chipset provides a marginal performance advantage. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A22 if you prefer a brighter, more color-accurate display for media consumption and value the Samsung ecosystem and software experience, even if it means a slight compromise in raw performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Helio G80 in the Galaxy A22 struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While the Helio G80 is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a playable frame rate. Expect some occasional stuttering, especially in intense scenes. The Hot 11s with the G88 will offer a slight improvement, but neither phone is a dedicated gaming device.
❓ Is the 15W charging on the Galaxy A22 significantly faster than what the Infinix Hot 11s offers?
Given the similar battery capacities (estimated around 5000mAh), the Galaxy A22’s 15W charging will likely result in a noticeably faster charge time compared to the Infinix Hot 11s, assuming the Hot 11s has a lower wattage charger. Expect the A22 to reach a full charge in approximately 2.5-3 hours, while the Hot 11s may take longer.
❓ How does Samsung's One UI compare to Infinix's XOS in terms of software experience?
Samsung's One UI is generally considered more polished and feature-rich than Infinix's XOS. One UI offers a cleaner interface, more customization options, and a longer software support commitment. XOS, while functional, often includes pre-installed bloatware and may receive fewer software updates.
