The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Infinix Hot 11 and Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro are two strong contenders. Both aim to deliver a compelling experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The Hot 11 focuses on providing a solid all-around package, while the Poco M4 Pro prioritizes display quality and faster charging, backed by a more powerful chipset.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro is the better choice. Its Helio G96 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Hot 11’s Helio G70, and the brighter 737 nit display significantly enhances media consumption. While battery life is comparable, the 33W charging is a substantial advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 17 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 21 | Available. Released 2022, March 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.2 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 179.5 g (6.31 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CB Helio G70 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 58 min |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silver Wave, Purple, Emerald Green, Polar Black | Power Black, Cool Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | X662, X662B, X689F | MZB0B5VIN, 2201117PI, 2201117PG |
| Price | About 110 EUR | € 100.18 |
| SAR | - | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.2 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318444 (v9)
GeekBench: 1836 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Hot 11
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent battery life (126h endurance)
- Reliable Mediatek Helio G70 chipset for basic tasks
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Poco M4 Pro
- Display brightness likely lower, impacting outdoor visibility
- Slower charging speeds (unspecified)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro
- More powerful Mediatek Helio G96 chipset
- Brighter 737 nit display for better viewing experience
- 33W fast charging with PD3.0 and QC3
- May be slightly more expensive than the Infinix Hot 11
- Battery life is comparable, not superior
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Poco M4 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 737 nits, compared to the Infinix Hot 11 which lacks published brightness data. This difference is crucial for outdoor visibility. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Poco’s higher brightness and infinite (nominal) contrast ratio will deliver a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. The Hot 11’s display specifications are less defined, suggesting a more basic panel aimed at cost savings. Users who frequently consume media outdoors or in brightly lit environments will greatly benefit from the Poco M4 Pro’s superior display.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Poco M4 Pro’s positioning suggests a more refined camera system. The inclusion of features like a dedicated night mode (likely) and potentially better image processing algorithms would give it an edge. The Hot 11 likely relies on software enhancements to compensate for a potentially less capable sensor. Users prioritizing camera quality should lean towards the Poco M4 Pro, assuming it offers more advanced features.
Performance
The Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G96 chipset represents a clear upgrade over the Infinix Hot 11’s Helio G70. The G96 features Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz, a step up from the G70’s 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This architectural improvement, combined with slightly higher clock speeds, translates to better multi-core performance and smoother gaming. While both chipsets are 12nm, the G96’s more efficient design should result in better sustained performance under load. Gamers and users who multitask frequently will notice the difference.
Battery Life
Both the Infinix Hot 11 and Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 126 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the Poco M4 Pro’s 33W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support is a game-changer. It can reach 100% charge in just 58 minutes, significantly reducing downtime. The Hot 11’s charging speed is not specified, implying a slower charging experience. For users who value convenience and quick top-ups, the Poco M4 Pro is the clear winner.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 11 if you prioritize a simple, reliable experience and are on an extremely tight budget. It’s a good option for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro if you enjoy mobile gaming, streaming videos, or taking photos, and value a brighter, more responsive display and faster charging speeds. It’s a more versatile device for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Poco M4 Pro’s Helio G96 chipset get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Helio G96 is generally efficient, but prolonged gaming will inevitably generate heat. The Poco M4 Pro’s thermal design should manage temperatures adequately, preventing significant throttling. However, sustained peak performance may be limited after extended use. Using a game booster app can help optimize performance and manage heat.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Poco M4 Pro compatible with all USB-C chargers?
The Poco M4 Pro supports PD3.0 and QC3 fast charging protocols. While it will charge with any USB-C charger, you’ll only achieve the full 33W speed with a charger that supports these protocols. Using a standard 5W charger will result in significantly slower charging times.
❓ How does the Infinix Hot 11 handle multitasking with several apps open?
The Infinix Hot 11’s Helio G70 and likely 4GB of RAM can handle moderate multitasking. However, switching between numerous apps may result in some lag or app reloading. It’s best suited for running a few apps simultaneously rather than heavy multitasking.
❓ What type of storage does the Poco M4 Pro use, and is it expandable?
The Poco M4 Pro utilizes UFS 2.2 storage, which is faster than older eMMC storage. This contributes to quicker app loading times and smoother performance. It also supports expandable storage via microSD card, allowing you to increase the storage capacity.
