The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the Infinix Hot 11 and Oppo A55s aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches under the hood. The Hot 11 relies on the Mediatek Helio G70, while the A55s boasts the more advanced Dimensity 700. This comparison will dissect the implications of these chipset choices, revealing which phone offers the best performance and value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the Oppo A55s is the better choice. Its Dimensity 700 chipset, built on a more efficient 7nm process, delivers noticeably improved CPU and GPU performance compared to the Infinix Hot 11’s Helio G70. While the Hot 11 offers a competitive price, the A55s provides a smoother overall experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 17 | 2022, April 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 21 | Available. Released 2022, April 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.2 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 163.9 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 480 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CB Helio G70 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silver Wave, Purple, Emerald Green, Polar Black | Black, Blue, Gold |
| Models | X662, X662B, X689F | CPH2309 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 160 EUR |
Infinix Hot 11
- Potentially lower price point
- Adequate for basic smartphone tasks
- May offer larger storage options
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower CPU and GPU performance
- No 5G connectivity
Oppo A55s
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 700 chipset
- 5G connectivity
- Improved CPU and GPU performance
- Slower 10W charging
- Potentially higher price
- May have limited storage options
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market segment, both likely utilize LCD panels. The Oppo A55s, being a slightly newer device, *may* benefit from improved color calibration. The absence of high refresh rate support on either device suggests a focus on maximizing battery life rather than visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature a primary camera alongside auxiliary lenses (potentially a depth or macro sensor). The image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 700 likely offers more advanced image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction in photos taken with the Oppo A55s. The Helio G70’s ISP is adequate for basic photography, but will struggle in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A55s’ Mediatek Dimensity 700, fabricated on a 7nm process, offers a significant advantage in efficiency and performance over the Infinix Hot 11’s 12nm Mediatek Helio G70. The Dimensity 700’s CPU features two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, compared to the Helio G70’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. This architectural upgrade, combined with the smaller process node, translates to approximately 15-20% faster CPU performance in benchmarks. The GPU also sees a boost, making the A55s more capable in graphically demanding games. The A55s also benefits from integrated 5G modem support, a feature absent in the Hot 11.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device. However, the Oppo A55s’ 7nm Dimensity 700 chipset is more power-efficient than the 12nm Helio G70 in the Infinix Hot 11. This efficiency advantage, coupled with the A55s’ 10W charging, suggests comparable or potentially slightly longer real-world battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity battery. The 10W charging on the A55s is slow by modern standards, but the efficiency of the Dimensity 700 may mitigate the impact.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 11 if you need a highly affordable device primarily for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and are willing to accept some performance limitations. Buy the Oppo A55s if you prefer a more responsive experience for multitasking, moderate gaming, and benefit from 5G connectivity, even if it means spending slightly more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A55s handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Dimensity 700’s GPU is significantly more capable than the Helio G70’s. While you may need to lower graphics settings for optimal frame rates, the A55s should provide a playable experience in PUBG Mobile, whereas the Hot 11 may struggle even on the lowest settings.
❓ Is the lack of fast charging on the Oppo A55s a major drawback?
The 10W charging is slow compared to modern standards. However, the Dimensity 700’s power efficiency means you won’t need to charge as frequently. Consider this a trade-off – slower charging, but potentially longer battery life between charges.
❓ Does the Infinix Hot 11 support 5G connectivity?
No, the Infinix Hot 11 utilizes the Mediatek Helio G70 chipset, which does not include an integrated 5G modem. The Oppo A55s, with its Dimensity 700, is the only one of the two capable of connecting to 5G networks.
❓ How much of a real-world performance difference will I notice between the two phones?
You'll notice a difference in app loading times, multitasking smoothness, and overall responsiveness. The Oppo A55s will feel snappier and more capable of handling multiple apps simultaneously without slowdowns, while the Infinix Hot 11 may exhibit occasional lag.
