The Infinix Hot 11 and Motorola Moto G31 represent compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone segment. Both devices aim to deliver essential features at a low price point, but they take slightly different approaches. The Hot 11 prioritizes raw processing power with the Helio G70, while the Moto G31 focuses on a more balanced experience, albeit with slower charging.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding applications, the Infinix Hot 11 offers a slight edge due to its Helio G70 chipset's higher Cortex-A75 clock speed. However, the Motorola Moto G31 provides a more refined software experience and a potentially longer-lasting battery, making it the better choice for everyday users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat7 300/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 17 | 2021, November 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 21 | Available. Released 2021, December 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.2 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 161.9 x 73.9 x 8.6 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak) | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CB Helio G70 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silver Wave, Purple, Emerald Green, Polar Black | Mineral Grey, Baby Blue |
| Models | X662, X662B, X689F | XT2173-3 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 120 EUR |
Infinix Hot 11
- Potentially faster charging speeds
- Slightly higher CPU clock speed on Cortex-A55 cores
- Better suited for demanding applications
- Software experience may be less refined
- Charging speed not explicitly stated
Motorola Moto G31
- Clean Android experience
- Potentially better battery optimization
- Slightly more efficient chipset
- Significantly slower 10W charging
- Slightly slower Cortex-A55 cores
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. While specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are unavailable, the focus here is on functionality over fidelity. Bezels are expected to be noticeable on both, and neither supports high refresh rates. The display experience will likely be similar, prioritizing visibility over visual richness.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both phones relying on budget sensors and image processing. Without specific sensor details, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. Both manufacturers often include a suite of cameras, including a primary sensor and potentially macro/depth sensors, but the quality of these secondary sensors is typically low. Image processing will likely focus on enhancing colors and contrast, rather than delivering natural-looking photos. The G85's slightly better ISP could offer a marginal improvement in image quality, but the difference will likely be minimal.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G31 features the Mediatek Helio G85, with its octa-core CPU clocked at 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Infinix Hot 11 uses the Helio G70, also with 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores, but paired with slightly slower 1.7 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This seemingly small difference in Cortex-A55 clock speed can impact multi-tasking and background app performance, giving the G85 a slight advantage. Both utilize a 12nm process, meaning thermal throttling could be a concern under sustained load, but the G85's slightly more efficient architecture may mitigate this. The G85's integrated GPU is also marginally more powerful, offering a small boost in gaming performance.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified, but both phones likely feature batteries in the 5000mAh range, typical for this segment. However, the Motorola Moto G31 is significantly hampered by its 10W wired charging. This means a full charge will take considerably longer compared to the Infinix Hot 11, which, while not specified, typically offers faster charging solutions in this price range. The slower charging speed on the Moto G31 will be a significant inconvenience for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 11 if you need a phone primarily for mobile gaming or running resource-intensive apps, and are willing to compromise on charging speed. Its Helio G70 chipset provides a performance boost for these tasks. Buy the Motorola Moto G31 if you prioritize a clean Android experience, reliable battery life, and a more balanced overall package for everyday use, even if it means slightly slower performance and a slower 10W charging rate.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G31's 10W charging make it impractical for daily use?
The 10W charging is a significant drawback. Expect a full charge to take well over 3 hours, making it less convenient for users who need quick top-ups. It's best suited for overnight charging.
❓ Will the Infinix Hot 11 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
Both phones utilize the 12nm process, meaning thermal throttling is possible. The Hot 11's slightly more powerful chipset may generate more heat, but Infinix often incorporates thermal management solutions to mitigate this. Expect some performance reduction after prolonged gaming.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speed between the Helio G70 and G85 noticeable in everyday tasks?
The difference is subtle for typical usage like browsing and social media. However, the G85's slightly faster Cortex-A55 cores may result in smoother multitasking and quicker app loading times.
❓ Which phone is better for running apps like PUBG Mobile?
The Infinix Hot 11 has a slight edge due to the Helio G70's higher clock speed. While neither phone will deliver a high-end gaming experience, the Hot 11 is more likely to maintain a stable frame rate at lower settings.
