The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the Infinix Hot 11 Play and the itel Vision 3 Turbo aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an incredibly accessible price point. However, they take different approaches: the Infinix prioritizes a more powerful, albeit older, chipset, while the itel focuses on faster charging and a newer, though less performant, processor. This comparison will dissect the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing app responsiveness and light gaming, the Infinix Hot 11 Play is the better choice due to its Mediatek Helio G35 chipset. However, the itel Vision 3 Turbo’s 18W charging offers a significant convenience advantage, making it ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost and don't heavily rely on demanding applications.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 15 | 2022 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 15 | Available. Released 2022 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 171.8 x 78 x 8.9 mm (6.76 x 3.07 x 0.35 in) | - |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 110.5 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 |
| Type | IPS LCD, 440 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP (wide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, Gold, Blue, Black | Blue |
| Price | About 120 EUR | - |
Infinix Hot 11 Play
- More powerful processor (Helio G35)
- Better CPU performance for multitasking
- Potentially better thermal management
- Slower charging speed (10W)
- Older chipset architecture
itel Vision 3 Turbo
- Faster charging (18W)
- More modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A55)
- Potentially better battery life due to efficient charging
- Less powerful processor (Unisoc SC9863A)
- Lower CPU performance for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common trait in this price bracket. However, specifics like resolution and brightness are missing. The focus here is on the internal hardware. The difference in processing power will likely be more noticeable than any minor display variations. Expect standard 60Hz refresh rates on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both devices likely featuring basic camera setups. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. Both manufacturers often include low-resolution auxiliary sensors (like 2MP depth or macro lenses) that offer limited practical benefit. Image processing will likely be basic on both, relying heavily on software algorithms to enhance photos. Expect acceptable results in good lighting conditions, but struggles in low-light scenarios.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Hot 11 Play’s Mediatek Helio G35, built on a 12nm process, features an octa-core CPU with a split configuration of 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This architecture, while older, provides a performance edge over the itel Vision 3 Turbo’s Unisoc SC9863A. The Unisoc chip, fabricated on a less efficient 28nm process, uses a more modern Cortex-A55 architecture but with lower clock speeds (4x1.6 GHz & 4x1.2 GHz). This translates to the Helio G35 offering better overall CPU performance and a more responsive user experience, particularly when multitasking. The 12nm node also implies better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained use.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified, the key differentiator is charging speed. The itel Vision 3 Turbo’s 18W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Infinix Hot 11 Play’s 10W charging. This means the itel can replenish its battery much faster, reducing downtime. Even with a potentially smaller battery capacity, the faster charging could result in a more convenient user experience for those who frequently need to top up their phone. The slower charging on the Infinix will require longer periods plugged into a power source.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 11 Play if you need a slightly more capable processor for running multiple apps or playing less-demanding mobile games. It’s suited for users who value performance over ultra-fast charging. Buy the itel Vision 3 Turbo if you prioritize convenience and quick top-ups, especially if you often find yourself away from a power outlet. This phone is best for basic communication, social media, and light web browsing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc SC9863A in the itel Vision 3 Turbo struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
While the Unisoc SC9863A can handle basic apps like WhatsApp and Facebook, it may exhibit some lag when multitasking or running multiple apps simultaneously. The Helio G35 in the Infinix Hot 11 Play will provide a smoother experience for these common tasks.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Infinix Hot 11 Play with its 10W charger?
With a 10W charger, fully charging the Infinix Hot 11 Play will likely take between 3 to 4 hours, depending on the battery capacity. This is considerably slower than the itel Vision 3 Turbo’s 18W charging, which could potentially achieve a full charge in around 2 hours.
❓ Is the itel Vision 3 Turbo suitable for playing mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty?
The itel Vision 3 Turbo is not ideally suited for demanding games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty. The Unisoc SC9863A processor will likely struggle to maintain a stable frame rate, even on low graphics settings. The Infinix Hot 11 Play offers a slightly better gaming experience, but still isn't designed for high-end gaming.
❓ Does either phone support fast charging protocols beyond the advertised wattage (e.g., Power Delivery)?
Neither phone is likely to support advanced fast charging protocols like Power Delivery. They are designed to work optimally with their included chargers, and using a more powerful charger may not result in significantly faster charging speeds.
