The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Infinix Hot 11 2022 and Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro both aim to deliver a compelling experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The Hot 11 2022 focuses on affordability, while the Poco M4 Pro prioritizes performance and faster charging, creating a clear divergence in target users.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro is the better choice. Its Mediatek Helio G96 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Infinix Hot 11 2022’s Unisoc T610, and the 33W fast charging significantly reduces downtime. While both offer similar battery endurance ratings, the Poco’s charging speed is a game-changer.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | eMMC 5.1 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 15 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 21 | Available. Released 2022, March 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.8 x 76.6 x 9.1 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199.6 g (7.05 oz) | 179.5 g (6.31 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 550 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T610 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 58 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aurora Green, Polar Black, Sunset Gold | Power Black, Cool Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | X675 | MZB0B5VIN, 2201117PI, 2201117PG |
| Price | About 110 EUR | € 100.18 |
| SAR | - | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.2 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318444 (v9)
GeekBench: 1836 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Hot 11 2022
- Lowest possible price point
- Acceptable battery life
- Functional for basic tasks
- Slow 10W charging
- Underpowered Unisoc T610 chipset
- Likely limited display quality
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro
- Faster and more efficient Helio G96 chipset
- 33W fast charging with PD3.0/QC3
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Slightly higher price
- Camera quality details are limited
- May not be ideal for extreme gaming
Display Comparison
The Poco M4 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 737 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Infinix Hot 11 2022. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for IPS LCDs), the Poco’s superior brightness is a clear advantage. The absence of refresh rate information for the Infinix Hot 11 2022 suggests it likely operates at the standard 60Hz, while the Poco M4 Pro is commonly available with a 90Hz panel, offering smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking for both. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the Poco M4 Pro’s positioning, it’s likely to have a more refined camera system with better image processing. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on both devices is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited real-world benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco M4 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G96, with its 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, offers a substantial performance advantage over the Infinix Hot 11 2022’s Unisoc T610 (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75). The Cortex-A76 architecture in the Helio G96 is a generation ahead, providing better single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. While both are 12nm chips, the architectural improvements in the Helio G96 are key. The Poco’s GPU is also more capable, making it the better choice for casual gaming.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 126 hours, suggesting similar battery life under typical usage. However, the Poco M4 Pro’s 33W wired charging (with PD3.0 and QC3 support) is a significant advantage over the Infinix Hot 11 2022’s slow 10W charging. The Poco M4 Pro can reach 100% charge in just 58 minutes, while the Hot 11 2022 will take considerably longer, making it less convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 11 2022 if you absolutely need the lowest possible price and your usage is limited to basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro if you prioritize smoother multitasking, occasional gaming, and the convenience of rapid charging – even if it means spending a little more upfront.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Unisoc T610 in the Infinix Hot 11 2022 sufficient for playing PUBG Mobile?
While PUBG Mobile may be playable on the Infinix Hot 11 2022, expect to run it on low graphics settings with potentially noticeable frame drops. The Unisoc T610 lacks the graphical horsepower for a smooth experience on higher settings. The Poco M4 Pro’s Helio G96 is significantly better suited for gaming.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Poco M4 Pro compared to the 10W charging on the Infinix Hot 11 2022?
The Poco M4 Pro’s 33W charging is dramatically faster. It can fully charge the battery in approximately 58 minutes. The Infinix Hot 11 2022’s 10W charging will likely take over 3 hours to reach 100%, making it significantly less convenient for users who need a quick top-up.
❓ Does the Poco M4 Pro support 90Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling?
Yes, many variants of the Poco M4 Pro come equipped with a 90Hz display, offering a noticeably smoother scrolling experience compared to the standard 60Hz panel likely found on the Infinix Hot 11 2022. This makes everyday tasks and gaming feel more fluid.
