The Infinix Hot 10s and Oppo A54 5G represent two distinct approaches to the budget 5G smartphone market. The Hot 10s prioritizes raw processing power with its MediaTek Helio G85, while the A54 5G focuses on efficiency and 5G connectivity with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing 5G connectivity and longer-term efficiency, the Oppo A54 5G is the better choice. While the Infinix Hot 10s boasts a more powerful CPU core configuration, the Snapdragon 480’s 8nm process and integrated 5G modem offer a smoother, more future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 21 | 2021, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 12 | Available. Released 2021, April 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 171.5 x 77.5 x 9.2 mm (6.75 x 3.05 x 0.36 in) | 162.9 x 74.7 x 8.4 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 110.5 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 (single lane) |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0, 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, Morandi Green, Heart of Ocean | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple, Space Silver |
| Models | X689B, X689, X689D | CPH2195, OPG02 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 120 EUR |
Infinix Hot 10s
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Helio G85
- May offer a larger battery capacity (spec not provided)
- Likely more affordable upfront cost
- Less power-efficient 12nm process
- No integrated 5G modem
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Oppo A54 5G
- Integrated 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More power-efficient 8nm Snapdragon 480
- Better sustained performance due to thermal efficiency
- Slower 10W charging
- Potentially higher upfront cost
- CPU performance may be slightly lower in peak bursts
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common trait in this price bracket. The key difference lies under the hood: display driver efficiency. Without specific brightness or color accuracy data, it's difficult to declare a clear winner. However, the A54 5G’s more efficient chipset could translate to slightly better battery life even with similar display settings.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and several auxiliary lenses. The Snapdragon 480 includes a Spectra 480 ISP, known for its decent image processing capabilities, potentially offering better dynamic range and noise reduction compared to the ISP found in the Helio G85. However, the ultimate image quality will depend heavily on the sensor size and lens aperture, data not provided.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The Infinix Hot 10s’ MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm) features a dual-cluster CPU configuration – two Cortex-A75 cores for peak performance and six Cortex-A55 cores for efficiency. The Oppo A54 5G’s Snapdragon 480 (8nm) uses Kryo 460 cores, also in a dual-cluster setup. Crucially, the 8nm process of the Snapdragon 480 offers superior power efficiency compared to the 12nm Helio G85. This means the A54 5G will likely experience less thermal throttling during sustained workloads, and deliver more consistent performance. While the A75 cores in the Hot 10s *peak* higher, the Snapdragon 480’s architecture is more balanced for everyday tasks and 5G usage.
Battery Life
The Oppo A54 5G’s 10W charging is a significant drawback. However, the Snapdragon 480’s 8nm efficiency is a major advantage. While the Hot 10s may have a larger battery (spec not provided), the A54 5G’s lower power consumption will likely result in comparable, or even superior, real-world battery life. The 10W charging on the A54 5G will take considerably longer to fully charge, but the efficiency gains could offset this for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 10s if you need maximum CPU performance for demanding apps and occasional gaming, and aren't heavily reliant on 5G. Its Helio G85 chipset provides a noticeable edge in multi-tasking and graphics-intensive tasks. Buy the Oppo A54 5G if you prioritize 5G connectivity, all-day battery life, and a more efficient processor, making it ideal for everyday use and streaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 480 in the Oppo A54 5G handle graphically demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 480 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to stick to medium graphics settings for a smooth experience. While not a gaming powerhouse, its efficiency prevents significant throttling, offering a more consistent frame rate than the Helio G85 might under similar conditions.
❓ How much slower is the 10W charging on the Oppo A54 5G compared to faster charging solutions?
10W charging is significantly slower than the 18W or 33W charging found on some competing devices. Expect a full charge to take around 3-4 hours. However, the A54 5G’s efficient processor means you may not need to top up as frequently, mitigating the slower charging speed.
❓ Is the difference in CPU performance between the Helio G85 and Snapdragon 480 noticeable in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the difference will be minimal. The Snapdragon 480’s efficiency provides a smoother overall experience, while the Helio G85’s peak performance is more noticeable in demanding apps or when multitasking heavily.
