The Infinix Hot 10 and Oppo A53s 5G represent two approaches to the budget smartphone market. The Hot 10 prioritizes affordability, while the A53s 5G adds the allure of 5G connectivity. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device delivers the best value for your money, focusing on the critical differences in their chipsets and overall performance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and faster data speeds, the Oppo A53s 5G is the better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset, built on a more efficient 7nm process, offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Infinix Hot 10’s Helio G70, despite the Hot 10’s slightly higher CPU clock speeds on its prime cores.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 17. Released 2020, October 17 | 2021, April 27 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, May 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 171.1 x 77.6 x 8.9 mm (6.74 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 164 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 189.6 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~264 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CB Helio G70 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 10, XOS 6.0 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 16 MP, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Obsidian Black, Amber Red, Moonlight Jade, Ocean Wave | Crystal Blue, Ink Black |
| Models | X682B, X682C, MZ-Infinix X682B, MZ-Infinix X682C | CPH2321 |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 170 EUR |
Infinix Hot 10
- Potentially lower price point
- Likely larger battery capacity (estimated)
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Older, less efficient chipset
- No 5G connectivity
- Potentially slower performance in demanding tasks
Oppo A53s 5G
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More efficient and powerful Dimensity 700 chipset
- Modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A76)
- Slow 10W charging
- Potentially higher price
- May have a smaller battery capacity
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, both likely utilize LCD panels. The A53s 5G, being a newer device, *may* benefit from slightly improved color accuracy or brightness. The absence of information regarding refresh rates suggests both are likely capped at 60Hz. Bezels are expected to be relatively substantial on both models, typical for this segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will heavily depend on sensor size and image processing. It’s reasonable to assume the A53s 5G, as a newer model, may have slightly improved image processing algorithms. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing gimmick, offering minimal practical benefit due to the small sensor size and limited detail capture.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A53s 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 10’s Mediatek Helio G70 (12nm). The 7nm process allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and sustained performance. While the Hot 10 boasts 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores, the A53s 5G counters with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores – a newer architecture offering better IPC (Instructions Per Clock). This means the A53s 5G will handle complex tasks and multitasking more smoothly. The A53s 5G also benefits from an integrated 5G modem, a feature absent in the Hot 10.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for the Hot 10, but typical for this segment is around 5000mAh. The A53s 5G is limited to 10W wired charging, which is slow by modern standards. The Hot 10, lacking fast charging information, likely offers a similar charging speed. The Dimensity 700’s superior power efficiency in the A53s 5G could partially offset the potentially larger battery capacity of the Hot 10, resulting in comparable real-world battery life, but the A53s 5G will likely be more efficient during 5G usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 10 if you need a highly affordable device for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and 5G connectivity isn't a priority. Buy the Oppo A53s 5G if you want a phone capable of handling more demanding apps, enjoy faster download speeds with 5G, and appreciate a more modern chipset architecture for improved efficiency and longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A53s 5G's Dimensity 700 chipset handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Mediatek Dimensity 700 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. While it won't match the performance of flagship chipsets, it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Helio G70 in the Infinix Hot 10, thanks to its more powerful CPU and GPU.
❓ How much faster is 5G on the Oppo A53s 5G compared to 4G on the Infinix Hot 10?
5G speeds on the Oppo A53s 5G can be significantly faster than 4G on the Infinix Hot 10, potentially offering download speeds 10-100 times faster depending on network conditions and carrier support. This translates to quicker app downloads, smoother streaming, and faster web browsing.
❓ Is the 10W charging on the Oppo A53s 5G a major drawback?
Yes, 10W charging is relatively slow compared to modern fast charging standards. Expect a full charge to take over 3 hours. This is a significant compromise, but the Dimensity 700's efficiency may mitigate the impact somewhat by reducing the frequency of charging.
