The Infinix Hot 10 Lite and Oppo A12s represent the extreme end of the budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price point, but they achieve this with different hardware choices. This comparison dissects those choices, focusing on the core performance differences stemming from their respective MediaTek Helio chipsets.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and multitasking, the Oppo A12s is the better choice. Its Helio P35 chipset, with its octa-core configuration, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the quad-core Helio A20 in the Infinix Hot 10 Lite, justifying a potential price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | Yes |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 3, 7, 20 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 29. Released 2020, October 26 | 2020, July 14. Released 2020, July 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.5 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.52 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 155.9 x 75.5 x 8.3 mm (6.14 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 165 g (5.82 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 95.9 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761D Helio A20 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | - | Yes |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| Phonebook | - | Yes |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Triple-LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 3.2 MP | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | - | No |
| Messaging | - | SMS |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 713 h (2G) / Up to 428 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 15 h (2G) / Up to 6 h 30 min (3G) | - |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4230 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Red, Blue, Green | Deep Blue, Flowing Silver |
| Models | X657B | - |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.28 W/kg (head) 0.42 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.49 W/kg (head) |
Infinix Hot 10 Lite
- Potentially lower price point
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Likely longer battery life due to less demanding processor
- Significantly slower performance
- Struggles with multitasking
- Poor gaming performance
Oppo A12s
- Faster and more responsive performance
- Better multitasking capabilities
- Slightly improved gaming experience
- Potentially higher price
- May have slightly shorter battery life under heavy load
- Still limited by budget components
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly impressive display. Both likely utilize standard IPS LCD panels, and detailed specifications like brightness and color accuracy are unavailable. However, the focus here is on performance, and display differences are unlikely to be a deciding factor for buyers in this segment. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, typical for this price range.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar on both devices, relying on budget sensors and image processing. Detailed sensor information is unavailable, but both will likely feature a primary camera and potentially depth or macro sensors of limited utility. The focus should not be on image quality, as both will deliver passable results in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low light. The Helio P35’s slightly more powerful ISP *may* offer a marginal improvement in image processing speed, but the difference will be minimal.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A12s features the MediaTek Helio P35, an octa-core processor with a configuration of four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.35 GHz and another four at 1.8 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Infinix Hot 10 Lite’s Helio A20, a quad-core processor clocked at 1.8 GHz, all Cortex-A53 cores. The P35’s octa-core design allows for more efficient multitasking and a smoother experience when running multiple apps. While both are built on a 12nm process, the P35’s architecture provides a significant advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. The A20 is sufficient for very basic operations, but will struggle with anything beyond simple app switching.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 10W wired charging, indicating similar charging speeds. While battery capacity isn't specified, both are likely to house around a 4000-5000 mAh battery. The Helio P35’s greater efficiency, however, could translate to slightly better battery life in real-world usage, as it completes tasks more quickly and spends more time in a low-power state. The 10W charging will result in relatively slow charging times for both devices – expect several hours to reach a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Hot 10 Lite if you need a truly minimal smartphone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Oppo A12s if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for everyday use, including occasional gaming and multitasking, and are willing to spend a little more for that performance boost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A12s handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio P35 in the Oppo A12s can run PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at low to medium settings to maintain a playable frame rate. The Infinix Hot 10 Lite’s Helio A20 will struggle significantly with PUBG, even at the lowest settings.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Helio A20 and Helio P35 noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the difference is quite noticeable. The Oppo A12s with the Helio P35 will feel significantly smoother when opening apps, switching between them, and browsing the web. The Infinix Hot 10 Lite will exhibit more lag and slowdown, especially with multiple apps open.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge both phones with the 10W charger?
Expect both phones to take approximately 3-4 hours to fully charge from 0% to 100% using the included 10W charger. The charging speed is relatively slow on both devices.
❓ Which phone is better for someone who primarily uses WhatsApp and makes calls?
For basic usage like WhatsApp and calls, the Infinix Hot 10 Lite is sufficient. The Helio A20 can handle these tasks without issue. However, the Oppo A12s will still provide a smoother and more responsive experience, even for these simple tasks.
