The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro and Infinix GT 30 represent compelling options. The Poco F6 Pro arrives as a performance-focused contender with a flagship-tier chipset, while the Infinix GT 30 aims to deliver a balanced experience with a focus on value and gaming aesthetics. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers significantly higher processing power. However, the Infinix GT 30 offers a strong value proposition for budget-conscious gamers and everyday users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 08 | 2024, May 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 11 | Available. Released 2024, May 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.8 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2720 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2304Hz PWM, 700 nits (typ), 1600 nits (peak), 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8μm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 111˚, (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7 (market/region dependent), tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired
10W reverse wired
Bypass Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Pulse Green, Cyber Blue, Blade White | Black, White |
| Models | X6876 | 23113RKC6G |
| Price | About 190 EUR | $ 382.99 / £ 289.00 / € 310.53 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Infinix GT 30
- Stylish design with gaming aesthetics
- 45W fast charging with bypass charging
- Competitive price point
- Dimensity 7400 chipset is less powerful than Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Limited camera information available
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 delivers flagship-level performance
- 120W ultra-fast charging (19 minutes to full)
- Bright and vibrant display (1203 nits)
- Higher price compared to the Infinix GT 30
- May run warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Poco F6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1203 nits, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Infinix GT 30’s display specifications aren’t provided, the Poco’s brightness advantage is substantial. Both are 120Hz panels, but the Poco’s higher peak brightness and likely superior color calibration (typical of Xiaomi’s flagship-adjacent devices) give it an edge. We expect the Poco to have better viewing angles and color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Infinix GT 30, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Poco F6 Pro is likely to offer a more refined camera experience due to Xiaomi’s image processing expertise. Sensor size and aperture are critical, and the Poco’s likely larger sensor will capture more light, resulting in better low-light performance. We anticipate the Poco to have more advanced features like improved HDR and video stabilization. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the Infinix GT 30 would be a key differentiator, but is currently unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F6 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a powerhouse, featuring a 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core, paired with 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 and 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 cores, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. This architecture provides a substantial performance leap over the Infinix GT 30’s Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) which utilizes 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s superior core configuration and Adreno GPU will translate to significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and higher sustained frame rates in demanding games. The 4nm process node on both chips contributes to thermal efficiency, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is generally more efficient, potentially leading to less throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Poco F6 Pro shines in battery charging, boasting 120W wired charging capable of a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is a significant advantage over the Infinix GT 30’s 45W wired charging. While the Infinix GT 30 offers 10W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories, the Poco’s charging speed is far more impactful for daily use. The Poco F6 Pro’s active use score of 10:29h suggests excellent battery life, and while the GT 30’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Poco mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix GT 30 if you need a stylish, capable phone for everyday tasks and casual gaming, and prioritize a lower price point. You'll appreciate its bypass charging and decent performance. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro if you demand top-tier performance for demanding games, content creation, or heavy multitasking, and are willing to pay a premium for the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and its associated benefits like faster app loading and smoother frame rates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7400 in the Infinix GT 30 struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 7400 is a capable chip, it won't deliver the same level of performance as the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Poco F6 Pro. Genshin Impact may require lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate on the GT 30, whereas the Poco F6 Pro should handle it at higher settings.
❓ How effective is the 120W charging on the Poco F6 Pro with the phone in use?
The Poco F6 Pro’s 120W charging is remarkably fast even while the phone is being used, though it won’t reach the full 19-minute 0-100% claim. You can expect a significant charge boost in a short amount of time, even during light gaming or browsing.
❓ What is 'bypass charging' on the Infinix GT 30 and how does it benefit gamers?
Bypass charging allows the phone to be powered directly from the charger while gaming, reducing strain on the battery and preventing overheating. This can lead to more sustained performance during long gaming sessions.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and Dimensity 7400 noticeable in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the difference will be minimal. However, when opening demanding apps, multitasking, or editing photos/videos, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Poco F6 Pro will feel noticeably snappier and more responsive.
