Infinix GT 30 vs Samsung Galaxy A54: A Detailed Comparison for Gamers and Everyday Users

The Infinix GT 30 and Samsung Galaxy A54 represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. The GT 30 aggressively targets gamers with its Dimensity 7400 chipset and fast charging, while the Galaxy A54 prioritizes a well-rounded experience with a focus on battery life and Samsung’s established software ecosystem. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing all-day battery and a polished software experience, the Samsung Galaxy A54 is the better choice. However, gamers and those who value rapid charging will find the Infinix GT 30’s performance and 45W charging a significant advantage, despite the A54's slightly longer endurance rating.

PHONES
Phone Names Infinix GT 30 Samsung Galaxy A54
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub61, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 -25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA
Launch
Announced2025, August 082023, March 15
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, August 11Available. Released 2023, March 24
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, plastic backGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame
Dimensions163.7 x 75.8 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.31 in)158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight187 g (6.60 oz)202 g (7.13 oz)
 -IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7iCorning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1224 x 2720 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~440 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density)
Size6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2304Hz PWM, 700 nits (typ), 1600 nits (peak), 4500 nits (peak)Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
GPUMali-G615 MC2Mali-G68 MP5
OSAndroid 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 15Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7
Memory
Card slotNomicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual64 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8μm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 111˚, (ultrawide), AF-
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, panorama, HDR
Single-32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Triple-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro)
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
Single13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide)32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE5.3, A2DP, LE
Infrared portYes-
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEOGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioFM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyroFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only)
 -Virtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging45W wired 10W reverse wired Bypass Charging25W wired
Type5500 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsPulse Green, Cyber Blue, Blade WhiteLime, Graphite, Violet, White
ModelsX6876SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W
PriceAbout 190 EUR€ 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999
SAR-0.81 W/kg (head)     0.67 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.69 W/kg (head)     1.34 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 119h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -26.6 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Infinix GT 30

  • Faster 45W charging significantly reduces downtime.
  • Dimensity 7400 offers potentially better gaming performance.
  • Bypass charging allows for gaming while charging.

  • Battery capacity and endurance are unknown.
  • Camera performance is unproven without detailed specs.

Samsung Galaxy A54

  • Excellent battery life with 119-hour endurance rating.
  • Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
  • Samsung’s refined software and established brand reputation.

  • Slower 25W charging.
  • Exynos 1380 may throttle under sustained gaming loads.

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A54 boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 980 nits, which translates to better visibility under direct sunlight compared to the Infinix GT 30 (brightness data unavailable). While the GT 30’s panel specifics are unknown, the A54’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. The A54’s display is likely to offer more accurate color reproduction, a hallmark of Samsung’s panels, though the GT 30 may compensate with a higher refresh rate (spec not provided).

Camera Comparison

Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. The Galaxy A54 likely benefits from Samsung’s established image processing algorithms, known for vibrant colors and good dynamic range. The GT 30’s camera performance is less predictable without sensor size and aperture details. It’s reasonable to assume the A54’s OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) will provide sharper images and smoother video recording, particularly in low-light conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size.

Performance

The Infinix GT 30’s Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) and the Samsung Galaxy A54’s Exynos 1380 (5nm) represent a fascinating architectural matchup. While both CPUs utilize an octa-core configuration with 4x Cortex-A78 and 4x Cortex-A55 cores, the 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7400 should offer improved thermal efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance under load. The Exynos 1380’s 5nm node is also efficient, but the GT 30 is geared towards gaming, suggesting a more aggressive performance profile. The lack of RAM specifications for the GT 30 makes a direct comparison difficult, but assuming comparable LPDDR5X RAM, the Dimensity 7400 is likely to deliver a smoother gaming experience.

Battery Life

The Samsung Galaxy A54 demonstrates impressive battery endurance, achieving an endurance rating of 119 hours and 11:15 hours of active use. The Infinix GT 30’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 45W wired charging significantly outpaces the A54’s 25W charging. This means the GT 30 can replenish its battery much faster, potentially mitigating any capacity disadvantage. The GT 30 also features 10W reverse wired charging and bypass charging, allowing it to charge while in use – features absent on the A54.

Buying Guide

Buy the Infinix GT 30 if you need a phone primarily for gaming, demand fast charging speeds, and appreciate a more aggressive, performance-focused design. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A54 if you prefer a balanced smartphone experience with excellent battery life, a refined user interface, and a more established brand reputation. The A54 is ideal for users who prioritize longevity and consistent performance over raw power.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 1380 is a capable chip, it's known to exhibit some thermal throttling under sustained heavy loads like gaming. The Galaxy A54's cooling system is adequate for typical use, but extended gaming may lead to reduced performance to prevent overheating. The Infinix GT 30's Dimensity 7400, built on a 4nm process, is likely to manage heat more effectively.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on smartphones offer limited practical value. The small sensor size results in low-resolution images with limited detail. While they can be fun to experiment with, don't expect professional-quality macro photography from either the Infinix GT 30 or the Samsung Galaxy A54.
❓ Does the Infinix GT 30 support high frame rates (90fps or higher) in popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Dimensity 7400 chipset is capable of supporting high frame rates in PUBG Mobile, but actual performance will depend on the game's optimization and the phone's thermal management. The GT 30's focus on gaming suggests it's likely to offer a smoother experience than the A54, but testing is required to confirm specific frame rate capabilities.
❓ What is 'bypass charging' on the Infinix GT 30 and how does it benefit gamers?
Bypass charging allows the Infinix GT 30 to draw power directly from the charger while being used, even during demanding tasks like gaming. This prevents the battery from discharging while gaming, effectively allowing you to play for extended periods without worrying about battery life. This feature is not available on the Samsung Galaxy A54.