The Infinix GT 30 and Nothing Phone (2a) Plus both target the competitive mid-range market, but with distinct approaches. The GT 30 leans heavily into gaming aesthetics and performance, while the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus prioritizes a refined user experience and a unique design. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balanced experience and a unique aesthetic, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus emerges as the winner. Its superior battery life (16:34h active use) and brighter display (1097 nits) offer a more polished daily experience. However, gamers on a budget will find the Infinix GT 30 a compelling option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 08 | 2024, July 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 11 | Available. Released 2024, August 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.8 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 161.7 x 76.3 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2720 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.5 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2304Hz PWM, 700 nits (typ), 1600 nits (peak), 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8μm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 111˚, (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.76" |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired
10W reverse wired
Bypass Charging | 50W wired, 50% in 21 min, 100% in 56 min |
| Type | 5500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Pulse Green, Cyber Blue, Blade White | Black, Grey |
| Models | X6876 | A142P |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 269.90 / ₹ 22,599 |
Infinix GT 30
- Potentially higher gaming performance due to Dimensity 7400
- Bypass charging for uninterrupted gaming
- Likely more aggressive pricing
- Charging speed is slower at 45W
- Battery life is unknown and potentially lower
- Display brightness likely lower than Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
- Excellent battery life (16:34h active use)
- Faster 50W charging
- Brighter display (1097 nits)
- Dimensity 7350 Pro may offer slightly less raw gaming power
- Potentially higher price point
- Design may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1097 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Infinix GT 30’s display specs are not provided, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s brightness advantage is substantial. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s panel likely benefits users who consume a lot of outdoor content. The lack of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate scaling isn’t as efficient as on flagship phones, but the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Infinix GT 30, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s camera system is likely to offer a more consistent and refined experience. The focus should be on the main sensor performance and image processing. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s image processing is known for its natural color reproduction, while the GT 30 may lean towards more saturated images, appealing to a different aesthetic preference. The absence of OIS information for the GT 30 is a concern, potentially leading to less stable video recording.
Performance
Both phones utilize Mediatek’s 4nm process technology, but differ in their chipsets. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus features the Dimensity 7350 Pro, with a CPU configuration of 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 cores. The Infinix GT 30 employs the Dimensity 7400, utilizing 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The A715 cores in the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus represent a newer generation architecture, potentially offering improved single-core performance. While the GT 30’s A78 cores are faster clocked, the architectural improvements in the 7350 Pro may translate to a smoother overall experience, especially in sustained workloads. The GT 30’s focus on gaming may be further enhanced by optimized software, but the 7350 Pro’s newer architecture provides a strong foundation.
Battery Life
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, achieving 16:34 hours of active use. The Infinix GT 30’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 45W charging is slower than the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s 50W charging, which can reach 50% in 21 minutes and 100% in 56 minutes. The faster charging on the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is a significant convenience factor, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The GT 30’s bypass charging feature is a plus for gamers, allowing play while charging with minimal heat buildup, but the slower overall charging speed remains a drawback.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix GT 30 if you need a phone specifically optimized for gaming on a tight budget, valuing raw performance and a flashy design over all else. Buy the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus if you prefer a more refined, all-around experience with a focus on battery life, display quality, and a distinctive, minimalist aesthetic. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is the better choice for users who value longevity and a smoother user interface.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7400 in the Infinix GT 30 throttle under sustained gaming loads?
While the Dimensity 7400 is a capable chipset, throttling is always a possibility with any mobile processor under heavy load. The Infinix GT 30’s thermal management system will be crucial in mitigating this. The bypass charging feature is designed to help with this by allowing gaming while charging without excessive heat buildup.
❓ How does the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s 50W charging compare to other phones in this price range?
50W charging is relatively fast for the mid-range segment. It’s significantly quicker than the Infinix GT 30’s 45W charging, reaching 100% in 56 minutes. Many competitors in this price range offer 33W or 45W charging, making the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus a more convenient option for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
❓ Is the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s Glyph Interface useful beyond aesthetics?
The Glyph Interface offers customizable light patterns for notifications and calls, providing a unique visual alert system. While primarily aesthetic, it can be useful for quickly identifying notifications without looking at the screen, and can be customized for different apps and contacts.
