Infinix GT 30 vs. Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Performance and Photography
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and a polished software experience, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. However, gamers and those demanding rapid charging will find the Infinix GT 30 a more compelling option, offering strong performance at a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix GT 30 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 08 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 11 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.8 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2720 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2304Hz PWM, 700 nits (typ), 1600 nits (peak), 4500 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8μm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 111˚, (ultrawide), AF | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired 10W reverse wired Bypass Charging | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5500 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pulse Green, Cyber Blue, Blade White | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | X6876 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Infinix GT 30
- Significantly faster 45W charging
- Potentially better sustained gaming performance due to 4nm process
- 10W reverse wired charging
- Likely inferior camera performance compared to Pixel 7a
- Software updates may be less frequent and slower
Google Pixel 7a
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing
- Clean and consistently updated Android experience
- Brighter and more color-accurate display
- Slower 18W charging
- Less powerful GPU for demanding games
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Infinix GT 30’s display specifications aren’t provided, its market positioning suggests a focus on refresh rate over absolute brightness. The Pixel 7a’s color accuracy, typical of Google’s displays, will likely be superior, making it better for content consumption. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means both will rely on adaptive refresh rate switching to conserve battery, but the Pixel 7a’s higher peak brightness provides a tangible advantage in outdoor scenarios.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera is its standout feature, leveraging Google’s renowned computational photography. While specific sensor details are missing for the GT 30, the Pixel 7a’s image processing pipeline consistently delivers exceptional dynamic range, accurate colors, and impressive low-light performance. The Tensor G2’s dedicated image signal processor (ISP) plays a crucial role in this. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also likely superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s processing power and advanced stabilization features. We can assume the GT 30 will offer a competent camera experience, but it won’t match the Pixel 7a’s consistently high quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) in the GT 30 versus the Google Tensor G2 (5nm) in the Pixel 7a. While the Tensor G2’s Cortex-X1 cores (2.85 GHz) offer higher peak clock speeds than the GT 30’s Cortex-A78 cores (2.6 GHz), the Dimensity 7400’s newer architecture and 4nm process could provide better sustained performance and thermal efficiency during extended gaming sessions. The Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 excels in AI-driven tasks, enhancing camera processing and voice recognition. The GT 30’s focus is clearly on raw gaming power, while the Pixel 7a prioritizes a balanced experience with AI smarts.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating solid battery life. The Infinix GT 30 compensates for a potentially smaller battery with significantly faster 45W wired charging, allowing for a full charge in considerably less time than the Pixel 7a’s 18W charging. The GT 30 also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Pixel 7a. While the Pixel 7a’s battery endurance is respectable, the GT 30’s charging speed is a major advantage for users who frequently need to top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix GT 30 if you need a phone primarily for gaming, value extremely fast 45W charging, and appreciate a more customizable Android experience. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize exceptional camera performance, a clean and consistently updated Android experience, and a brighter, more color-accurate display for everyday use.