Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro vs. Infinix GT 20 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and ultra-fast charging, the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset provides a significant performance advantage, and the 120W charging is a game-changer. However, the Infinix GT 20 Pro offers a strong value proposition for those seeking a capable all-rounder without breaking the bank.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix GT 20 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 26 | 2024, May 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 26 | Available. Released 2024, May 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.4 x 8.2 mm (6.47 x 2.97 x 0.32 in) | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 112.7 cm2 (~91.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2304Hz PWM, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, XOS 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF, OIS 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7 (market/region dependent), tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD3 | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mecha Blue, Mecha Orange, Mecha Silver | Black, White |
| Models | X6871 | 23113RKC6G |
| Price | About 250 EUR | $ 382.99 / £ 289.00 / € 310.53 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Infinix GT 20 Pro
- Excellent value for money
- Capable Dimensity 8200 Ultimate processor
- 45W fast charging with PD3 support
- Performance lags behind Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Display likely less bright than Poco F6 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (19 minutes to full)
- High peak display brightness (1203 nits)
- Higher price point
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Poco F6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1203 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Infinix GT 20 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be lower in peak brightness. Both devices support 120Hz refresh rates, but the Poco F6 Pro’s higher brightness provides a superior viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rate switching to conserve battery, rather than dynamically scaling down to 1Hz for static content.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Infinix GT 20 Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Poco F6 Pro is expected to feature a more advanced camera system, leveraging the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP capabilities. The focus should be on the main sensor size and aperture; larger sensors and wider apertures capture more light, resulting in better low-light performance. Image processing algorithms also play a crucial role, and Qualcomm’s ISP is known for its excellent image quality and dynamic range. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the Poco F6 Pro would further enhance image and video quality, particularly in challenging conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F6 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) utilizes a 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core, offering a substantial performance leap over the Infinix GT 20 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s architecture, with its Cortex-X3 and improved A715/A710 cores, translates to faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and higher sustained performance in graphically intensive games. While the Dimensity 8200 Ultimate is a capable chip, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s superior GPU and CPU architecture provide a clear advantage. Both utilize a 4nm process, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimizations for thermal efficiency.
Battery Life
The Poco F6 Pro’s 120W charging is a standout feature, capable of fully charging the device in just 19 minutes. This is a significant advantage over the Infinix GT 20 Pro’s 45W charging. While the Poco F6 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its active use score of 10:29h suggests a well-optimized battery life. The faster charging speed mitigates any potential concerns about battery capacity, allowing users to quickly top up their device when needed. The Infinix GT 20 Pro’s 45W charging, while respectable, is considerably slower, requiring more downtime to reach a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix GT 20 Pro if you need a well-rounded smartphone with good performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, and if maximizing value for your money is a priority. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro if you demand the highest possible performance for demanding games and applications, and if you value incredibly fast charging speeds and are willing to pay a premium.