The Icemobile Apollo Touch and the LG T375 Cookie Smart represent the extreme end of the smartphone market – devices aimed at first-time smartphone buyers or those needing a very basic, affordable connection. This comparison focuses on dissecting the known specifications of the Apollo Touch, powered by a Mediatek MT6515, and extrapolating the likely experience of the LG T375 Cookie Smart based on its market positioning and LG’s historical approach to entry-level devices.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a functional smartphone experience, the Icemobile Apollo Touch is the clear winner. Its Mediatek MT6515 chipset, while not powerful, provides a demonstrable performance advantage over what is typically found in the LG T375 Cookie Smart’s segment, offering a smoother, more responsive user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| GPRS | Class 12 | Class 12 |
| Technology | GSM | GSM |
| | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 2 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2012, October. Released 2012, October | 2012, May. Released 2012, Q3 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | - | 103 x 59 x 10.7 mm (4.06 x 2.32 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM) | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM) |
| Weight | - | 96 g (3.39 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 320 x 480 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~165 ppi density) | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~125 ppi density) |
| Size | 3.5 inches, 36.5 cm2 | 3.2 inches, 31.7 cm2 (~52.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT | TFT, 256K colors |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 1.0 GHz Cortex-A9 | - |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6515 | - |
| GPU | PowerVR SGX531 | - |
| OS | Android 2.3.6 (Gingerbread) | - |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | - | Yes |
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | - | 50MB 128MB ROM 64MB RAM |
| Phonebook | - | 1000 entries, Photocall |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| Video | Yes | QCIF@15fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | VGA | - |
| | - | No |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 2.1, A2DP |
| NFC | No | - |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | FM radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | - | Yes |
| Java | - | Yes, MIDP 2.0 |
| Messaging | - | SMS, MMS, Email, IM |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | - |
| | MP4/H.264 player
MP3/WAV/eAAC+ player
Document viewer
Photo viewer/editor | SNS applications
MP4/H.263 player
MP3/AAC+ player
Organizer
Document viewer
Voice memo
Predictive text input |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 1200 mAh, removable | Removable Li-Ion 950 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Black, Pink, Blue, Green, Red, Yellow | White, Black, Red |
| Price | - | About 70 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.70 W/kg (head) 0.79 W/kg (body) |
Icemobile Apollo Touch
- Better processor performance with Mediatek MT6515
- Likely more responsive user interface
- Potential for more app compatibility
- Limited camera quality
- Outdated processor architecture
LG T375 Cookie Smart
- Potentially longer battery life due to lower power consumption
- Simpler user interface
- Likely lower price point
- Significantly slower performance
- Limited app compatibility
- Poor camera quality
Display Comparison
Given the price points of both devices, it’s safe to assume both utilize LCD panels. However, without specific details on the LG T375 Cookie Smart, we can only speculate. The Apollo Touch likely features a resolution around 480x800, typical for this chipset. The LG T375 Cookie Smart likely has a similar or lower resolution. Neither device is expected to offer high brightness or color accuracy, focusing instead on cost reduction. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices will be limited. The Apollo Touch may feature a 2MP or 3MP rear camera, sufficient for basic snapshots in good lighting conditions. The LG T375 Cookie Smart likely has a similar or lower resolution camera. Image quality will be poor in low light, and features like HDR or image stabilization are unlikely. Focusing on sensor size is irrelevant given the low resolution; image processing will be the primary determinant of image quality, and both devices will likely employ minimal processing to conserve resources.
Performance
The Icemobile Apollo Touch’s Mediatek MT6515, featuring a 1.0 GHz Cortex-A9 CPU, represents a significant performance advantage over the likely processor found in the LG T375 Cookie Smart. Historically, LG’s Cookie series prioritized battery life over raw processing power. The Cortex-A9 architecture in the Apollo Touch, while dated, is capable of handling basic multitasking and app usage. The LG T375 Cookie Smart likely utilizes an even older or less powerful ARM architecture, resulting in slower app loading times and a less fluid user interface. RAM capacity is also a critical factor; the Apollo Touch likely has at least 512MB, while the Cookie Smart may have less, further impacting performance.
Battery Life
Battery life is a key consideration for both devices. The LG T375 Cookie Smart, with its less powerful processor, may offer slightly longer battery life on a single charge. However, the Apollo Touch’s more efficient Mediatek chipset and potential for software optimization could mitigate this difference. Charging times will be slow on both devices, likely taking several hours to fully charge via micro-USB. Neither device is expected to support fast charging technologies.
Buying Guide
Buy the Icemobile Apollo Touch if you need a smartphone capable of running basic apps like WhatsApp, Facebook, and a lightweight web browser without significant lag. It’s suitable for users prioritizing a slightly better user experience and potential for future software updates. Buy the LG T375 Cookie Smart if your primary need is a device for making and receiving calls, sending texts, and minimal app usage, and you prioritize simplicity and potentially longer battery life due to a less demanding processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Icemobile Apollo Touch be able to run popular social media apps like Instagram and TikTok?
The Apollo Touch, with its Mediatek MT6515 processor and likely 512MB or 1GB of RAM, should be able to run basic versions of Instagram and TikTok. However, expect slow loading times, occasional lag, and limited functionality. Demanding features like high-resolution video recording or extensive filters may not work smoothly.
❓ Is the LG T375 Cookie Smart a good choice for someone who primarily needs a phone for calls and texts?
Yes, the LG T375 Cookie Smart is an excellent choice for users who primarily need a phone for basic communication. Its likely focus on battery life and simplicity makes it well-suited for calls and texts, without the complexities of a smartphone operating system.
❓ Can I expect any software updates for the Icemobile Apollo Touch?
Software update support for the Icemobile Apollo Touch is uncertain. Given its budget nature and the age of the Mediatek MT6515 chipset, it's unlikely to receive major Android version updates. However, minor security patches or bug fixes may be released by Icemobile.
