Comparing the i-mate K-JAM and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro isn't just a phone comparison; it's a journey through two decades of mobile innovation. The K-JAM, representing the early days of Windows Mobile, clashes with the modern feature set and performance of the Redmi Note 10 Pro, highlighting the incredible advancements in processing power, display technology, and battery life.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the vast majority of users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 732G chipset, vibrant 725 nit display, and 118-hour endurance rating offer a modern smartphone experience the i-mate K-JAM simply cannot match. The K-JAM appeals only to collectors or those fascinated by mobile history.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 |
| EDGE | Class 10 | - |
| GPRS | Class 10 | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2005, September | 2021, March 04 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 108 x 58 x 23.7 mm (4.25 x 2.28 x 0.93 in) | 164 x 76.5 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 in) |
| Keyboard | QWERTY | - |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 160 g (5.64 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 2.8 inches, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.8 inches, 42 x 57 mm, 24.3 cm2 (~38.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT resistive touchscreen, 65K colors | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 200 MHz ARM926EJ-S | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | TI OMAP 850 | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Microsoft Windows Mobile 5.0 PocketPC | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | miniSD, up to 2 GB | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64MB RAM, 128MB ROM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 1.3 MP | - |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| | No | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Alert types | Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, MP3 ringtones | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.0 | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | - | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | miniUSB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11b/g | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML (PocketIE) | - |
| Sensors | - | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | Microsoft ActiveSync
Pocket Office
MP3/AAC player | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min |
| Stand-by | Up to 200 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 5 h | - |
| Type | Removable Li-Po 1250 mAh battery | Li-Po 5020 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Stylish black | Onyx Gray, Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze |
| Models | - | M2101K6G, M2101K6R |
| Price | About 280 EUR | $ 107.43 / £ 163.94 / € 144.87 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | $ 189.99 |
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | $ 209.99 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | - | $ 221.00 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 348.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.7 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 295442 (v8)
GeekBench: 1780 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
i-mate K-JAM
- Historical significance – a piece of mobile history.
- Compact size – likely very pocketable.
- Simplicity – a less cluttered user experience (due to limited functionality).
- Extremely limited processing power.
- Poor display quality.
- Limited battery life.
- Outdated operating system and software support.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 732G processor.
- Bright and vibrant display.
- Long battery life with fast charging.
- Affordable price point (starting at $189.99).
- May not appeal to collectors of retro devices.
- Software bloatware (common in Xiaomi devices).
- Camera performance, while good, isn't flagship-level.
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s display is a world apart from the K-JAM’s likely small, low-resolution screen. The Redmi boasts a measured peak brightness of 725 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even outdoors, and an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio for vivid colors. The K-JAM’s display, typical of its era, would have prioritized power efficiency over brightness and color accuracy. The Redmi’s larger screen size and higher resolution are geared towards media consumption and productivity, tasks unimaginable on the K-JAM.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the comparison ends there. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s camera system, while details are limited in the provided data, benefits from modern image processing and likely a much larger sensor than the K-JAM’s. The K-JAM’s camera would have been limited by its low resolution and lack of features like optical image stabilization (OIS). The Redmi Note 10 Pro allows for detailed photos and videos, while the K-JAM’s output would be suitable only for basic documentation.
Performance
The architectural gap is immense. The i-mate K-JAM’s 200 MHz ARM926EJ-S CPU is dwarfed by the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G. The Snapdragon 732G, built on an 8nm process, features an octa-core configuration (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) delivering significantly higher processing power and efficiency. This translates to smooth multitasking, responsive app launches, and the ability to run demanding applications – capabilities the K-JAM simply lacks. The K-JAM would struggle with even basic web browsing, while the Redmi Note 10 Pro can handle modern mobile games.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s endurance rating of 118 hours is a testament to the advancements in battery technology and power management. While the K-JAM’s battery life was likely sufficient for its limited functionality, it pales in comparison. The Redmi Note 10 Pro also features 33W wired charging, capable of reaching 59% charge in just 30 minutes – a feature completely absent in the K-JAM era. The Redmi’s battery life allows for all-day use, while the K-JAM would likely require daily charging with minimal use.
Buying Guide
Buy the i-mate K-JAM if you're a collector of early smartphones, a mobile history enthusiast, or require a device for retro-computing experimentation. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone for everyday tasks, photography, and entertainment, with long battery life and a responsive user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Given the K-JAM's age, is it even possible to use it on modern cellular networks?
Highly unlikely. The i-mate K-JAM predates widespread 3G adoption, let alone 4G or 5G. Its cellular modem would not be compatible with modern network frequencies, rendering it unable to connect for calls or data.
❓ The Redmi Note 10 Pro has multiple RAM and storage configurations. Which should I choose?
For most users, the 128GB 6GB RAM configuration ($189.99) offers the best balance of storage and performance. 6GB of RAM is sufficient for multitasking, and 128GB provides ample space for apps, photos, and videos. Unless you are a heavy gamer or content creator, the 8GB RAM option is likely unnecessary.
❓ Can I install modern apps like WhatsApp or Facebook on the i-mate K-JAM?
No. The i-mate K-JAM runs Windows Mobile, a discontinued operating system. Modern apps are designed for Android or iOS and are not compatible with Windows Mobile. Even if you could find older versions of these apps, the K-JAM’s limited processing power would likely make them unusable.
