The Huawei Y9s and Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW represent different approaches to the mid-range 5G market. The Y9s, relying on Huawei’s Kirin chipset, aims for a balance of features at a competitive price. The A51 5G UW, powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 765G, prioritizes 5G connectivity and a more robust processing experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset, built on a more efficient 7nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Huawei Y9s’ Kirin 710F, especially in demanding tasks and 5G scenarios.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International | 2, 4, 5, 13, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 260, 261 mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, November 08. Released 2019, November 08 | 2020, August 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, August 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 77.2 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) | 158.8 x 73.4 x 8.6 mm (6.25 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 188.8 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 106.6 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Kirin 710F (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G51 MP4 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), EMUI 9.1 | Android 10, One UI 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 5 MP, AF |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 13mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.2 | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 672 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 5 h |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Breathing Crystal, Phantom Purple | Prism Bricks Blue |
| Models | STK-L21, STK-LX3, STK-L22 | SM-A516V |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 470 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.70 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.32 W/kg (body) |
Huawei Y9s
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional and reliable for basic tasks
- May include features not found on the A51 5G UW (depending on region)
- Older, less efficient Kirin 710F chipset
- Slow 10W charging
- Limited 5G performance compared to Snapdragon 765G
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW
- More powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset
- Faster 15W charging
- Better 5G connectivity and performance
- More efficient power consumption
- Generally higher price point
- May lack certain features found on the Y9s (depending on region)
- LCD display may not be as vibrant as some competitors
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are unavailable for the Y9s, the A51 5G UW’s display is likely a standard LCD panel. The focus here isn’t on premium display tech; it’s on functionality. The A51 5G UW benefits from the larger ecosystem of Samsung’s display calibration, potentially offering slightly more accurate colors. However, both are likely to be adequate for everyday use.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the main sensors, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Snapdragon 765G’s image signal processor (ISP) generally offers more advanced image processing capabilities than the Kirin 710F’s ISP. This means the A51 5G UW is likely to produce more detailed and dynamic photos, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The A51 5G UW’s 5G connectivity also enables faster uploads of high-resolution images and videos. The Y9s may rely more heavily on software processing to compensate for hardware limitations.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7nm) is a significant step up from the Huawei Y9s’ Kirin 710F (12nm). The 7nm process node allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, translating to better sustained performance and less thermal throttling. The Snapdragon 765G’s CPU configuration – a prime core, gold core, and six silver cores – is designed for optimized performance across various workloads, while the Kirin 710F’s Cortex-A73/A53 combination is older and less efficient. This difference will be most noticeable in gaming and demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Huawei Y9s’ 10W charging is a significant drawback compared to the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW’s 15W charging. While neither is particularly fast by modern standards, the 5W difference represents a 50% improvement in charging speed for the Samsung. The Kirin 710F’s less efficient architecture may also lead to slightly faster battery drain under heavy load, offsetting any potential gains from a larger battery (if present, which is not specified). The A51 5G UW’s more efficient chipset will contribute to better overall battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Y9s if you need a functional smartphone with basic features and are heavily constrained by budget, and are not reliant on Google Mobile Services. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW if you prioritize 5G performance, smoother multitasking, and a more modern chipset architecture, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Kirin 710F struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Kirin 710F will likely struggle with PUBG Mobile at higher settings. While playable at lower settings, you may experience frame drops and stuttering, especially during intense firefights. The Snapdragon 765G in the A51 5G UW offers a significantly smoother gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 5G experience on the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW compared to the Huawei Y9s?
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW utilizes the Snapdragon 765G, which has a more advanced 5G modem than what is typically found in devices paired with the Kirin 710F. This translates to faster download and upload speeds, lower latency, and a more stable 5G connection, particularly on mmWave networks (UW).
❓ Does the slower charging speed of the Huawei Y9s significantly impact usability?
Yes, the 10W charging on the Y9s is noticeably slower than the 15W charging on the A51 5G UW. It will take considerably longer to fully charge the device, which can be inconvenient for users who rely heavily on their phones throughout the day.
