Huawei Y9a vs. Oppo Reno 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Oppo Reno 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855 chipset offers a significant performance advantage over the Y9a’s Helio G80, making it better suited for demanding tasks and gaming. However, the Y9a remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Y9a | Oppo Reno 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - FRL-L22 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 78 NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - FRL-L23 | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 07. Released 2020, September 12 | 2019, April. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 76.5 x 9 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.63 inches, 106.1 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 22.5W / 40W wired (region dependent) | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh or 4300 mAh (region dependent) | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Silver, Sakura Pink, Midnight Black | Ocean Green, Jet Black |
| Models | FRL-22, FRL-23, FRL-L22, FRL-L23 | CPH1921 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 880 EUR |
Huawei Y9a
- Potentially faster charging (40W in some regions)
- More affordable price point
- Likely larger battery capacity (assumption based on market segment)
- Significantly weaker processor performance
- Less efficient chipset leading to potential throttling
- Inferior image processing capabilities
Oppo Reno 5G
- Much more powerful Snapdragon 855 processor
- Superior thermal efficiency
- Advanced ISP for better image quality
- Slower charging speed (20W)
- Higher price tag
- Older chipset, potentially limited software support in the long run
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature LCD panels (data unavailable), the focus here is on processing power, not display tech. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment. The lack of detailed display specs prevents a deeper analysis of color accuracy or brightness, but both will likely suffice for everyday use.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, the Reno 5G’s Snapdragon 855 ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more advanced than the Helio G80’s, offering superior image processing capabilities. This likely results in better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Y9a may rely more heavily on software processing to compensate for a potentially less capable sensor. We can assume both phones will include multiple rear cameras, but the Reno 5G’s ISP will likely extract more detail from its primary sensor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, built on a 7nm process, significantly outperforms the Huawei Y9a’s MediaTek Helio G80 (12nm). The Snapdragon 855’s Kryo 485 cores – a 1x2.84 GHz prime core, 3x2.42 GHz performance cores, and 4x1.78 GHz efficiency cores – provide a substantial advantage in both single-core and multi-core performance compared to the Y9a’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Reno 5G. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Huawei Y9a offers region-dependent charging speeds of 22.5W or 40W, while the Oppo Reno 5G is limited to 20W. While the Reno 5G’s charging is slower, the Snapdragon 855’s superior efficiency may offset the difference in battery life, especially with moderate usage. The Y9a’s faster charging (when available) will be beneficial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. Without knowing the battery capacities, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Y9a’s potential for faster charging is a notable advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Y9a if you need a large-screen phone with a decent camera and long battery life, and your primary use cases are social media, browsing, and light gaming. You're willing to trade raw power for affordability. Buy the Oppo Reno 5G if you prioritize performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications, and you want a phone with a more powerful processor that will hold up better over time, even if it means slightly slower charging.