Huawei Pura 80 Ultra vs Xiaomi 14 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a brighter display, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and 1281 nit display offer a noticeable edge in demanding tasks and outdoor visibility. However, the Pura 80 Ultra’s exceptional battery endurance and fast wireless charging are compelling alternatives.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Pura 80 Ultra | Xiaomi 14 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA - China only | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (China only) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 11 | 2024, February 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 11 | Available. Released 2024, February 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Shield Glass), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), titanium frame (grade 5) or aluminum alloy frame |
| Dimensions | 163 x 76.1 x 8.3 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 161.4 x 75.3 x 9.2 mm (6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 233.5 g (8.25 oz) | 219.8 / 224.4 / 229.5 g (7.76 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Kunlun Glass 2 (Basalt-tempered) / 2nd-Gen Crystal Armor Kunlun Glass, Mohs level 4 | Xiaomi Shield Glass |
| Resolution | 1276 x 2848 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~459 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.3 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, HDR Vivid, 120Hz, 1440Hz PWM, 3000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (typ), 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5GHz & 3x2.15 GHz & 4x1.6GHz) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Kirin 9020 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Maleoon 920 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | EMUI 15 (International), HarmonyOS 5.1 (China) | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lenses, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 67mm filter ring holder (optional) |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.6-4.0, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.4, 83mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.28", PDAF, sensor-shift OIS, 3.7x optical zoom 12.5 MP, f/3.6, 212mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, sensor-shift OIS, 9.4x optical zoom 40 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF * Both telephoto cameras utilize the same camera sensor w/o continuous optical zoom | 50 MP, f/1.6-f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.8, 75mm (telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.8, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, 1080p@960fps (interpolated), HDR Vivid, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR 10-bit rec. (4K@60fps, 1080p) |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, (ultrawide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, 1080p@240fps, HDR Vivid, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, L2HC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, DisplayPort, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired 80W wireless 20W reverse wireless 18W reverse wired | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 33 min 80W wireless, 100% in 46 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Po 5170 mAh - International· Li-Po 5700 mAh - China | Market-dependent versions:· 5000 mAh (Global)· 5300 mAh (China only) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Prestige Gold, Golden Black | Black, Blue, White, Titanium Gray |
| Models | LMR-AL10, LMU-LX9 | 24031PN0DC, 24030PN60G |
| Price | About 1880 EUR | € 663.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.83 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 41:00h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class D (45 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
- Exceptional battery endurance (41:00h)
- Fast 100W wired and 80W wireless charging
- Versatile reverse wireless and wired charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Lower peak display brightness
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Brighter display (1281 nits)
- Faster wired charging (33 minutes)
- Slightly lower battery endurance rating
- Wireless charging takes longer (46 minutes)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 1281 nits compared to the Pura 80 Ultra’s 1029 nits. This translates to superior readability under direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (not specified in the data, but standard for this class), the Xiaomi’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. The Pura 80 Ultra may benefit users sensitive to flicker if it employs a higher PWM dimming rate, but this is unconfirmed. Both devices likely offer excellent color accuracy, but the Xiaomi’s brightness provides a more vibrant viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, Xiaomi’s Ultra series is renowned for its camera prowess, and the 14 Ultra is expected to continue this trend. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced, offering superior image processing capabilities. While Huawei’s image processing is generally excellent, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra likely benefits from a more powerful ISP and potentially larger sensor sizes (assumed based on market positioning). The absence of information on sensor sizes and lens apertures prevents a more granular analysis.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is built on a more advanced process node than the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra’s Kirin 9020 (7nm). This 4nm process generally translates to improved thermal efficiency and higher sustained performance, reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon’s CPU configuration – a 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core alongside 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 and 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 cores – is architecturally superior to the Kirin’s octa-core setup, promising faster processing speeds. While the Kirin 9020 is no slouch, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 provides a demonstrable performance advantage.
Battery Life
The Huawei Pura 80 Ultra claims a remarkable 41:00h endurance and 1000 cycles, suggesting exceptional battery longevity. While the Xiaomi 14 Ultra’s active use score of 11:25h is competitive with the Pura 80 Ultra’s 11:51h, the Huawei’s endurance rating indicates superior overall battery life. However, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra compensates with faster charging: 90W wired (33 minutes to 100%) versus 100W on the Pura 80 Ultra, and 80W wireless (46 minutes) versus 80W wireless on the Huawei. The Pura 80 Ultra also offers 20W reverse wired and 20W reverse wireless charging, providing greater versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra if you need exceptional battery life, value fast wireless charging, and prefer a more polished, software-focused experience. Buy the Xiaomi 14 Ultra if you prioritize peak performance for gaming and demanding applications, demand the brightest possible display, and are a photography enthusiast seeking the latest camera innovations.