Huawei Pocket S vs. Motorola Razr+ 2025: A Detailed Foldable Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and future-proofing, the Motorola Razr+ 2025 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset and impressive 10:12 hour battery life significantly outperform the Pocket S’s Snapdragon 778G, despite the latter’s lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Pocket S | Motorola Razr+ 2025 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 02 | 2025, April 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 11 | Available. Released 2025, June 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (titanium) |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 170 x 75.5 x 7.2 mmFolded: 87.3 x 75.5 x 15.2 mm | Unfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1188 x 2790 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~442 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: OLED, 1.04 inch, 340 x 340 pixels, 328 ppi | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 670) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 735 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 40 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom |
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 10.7 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 10.7 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired, 52% in 20 min 5W reverse wired | 45W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Pink, Gren, Silver, Gold, Black | Pantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | BAL-AL60 | XT2451-1 |
| Price | About 830 EUR | $ 500.00 |
Huawei Pocket S
- More affordable price point
- Compact and stylish foldable design
- 40W fast wired charging
- Less powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Likely shorter battery life
- Potentially compromised camera performance
Motorola Razr+ 2025
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 performance
- Excellent 10:12 hour battery life
- 45W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Higher price tag
- May be slightly heavier due to larger battery
- Potential for software bloat (typical of Motorola)
Display Comparison
While both devices feature foldable displays, the provided data doesn't detail display specs. However, given the Pocket S's positioning, it likely utilizes a less advanced panel than the Razr+ 2025. Motorola typically employs LTPO technology in its flagship foldables, enabling variable refresh rates for improved power efficiency and smoother visuals. The Razr+ 2025 likely boasts higher peak brightness and potentially better color accuracy, crucial for outdoor visibility and content consumption.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, Motorola’s Razr+ line typically prioritizes camera quality in its flagship models. We can infer that the Razr+ 2025 likely features a larger main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The Pocket S, positioned as a more affordable option, likely compromises on camera hardware, potentially featuring a smaller sensor and less sophisticated image processing.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Motorola Razr+ 2025’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) is a significant leap forward from the Huawei Pocket S’s Snapdragon 778G (6nm). The 8s Gen 3 features a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside A720 and A520 cores, offering a substantial CPU performance advantage. The 4nm process node also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during prolonged use. The Pocket S’s 778G, while capable for everyday tasks, will struggle with demanding games and multitasking compared to the Razr+ 2025.
Battery Life
The Motorola Razr+ 2025 demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, achieving 10:12 hours of active use. This is likely due to the more efficient Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset and potentially a larger battery capacity (not specified). While the Pocket S’s 40W wired charging is respectable, the Razr+ 2025’s 45W wired and 15W wireless charging options offer greater flexibility and convenience. The 5W reverse wired charging on both devices is a standard feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Pocket S if you prioritize a more budget-friendly entry into the foldable world and don't demand the absolute highest performance for demanding tasks like intensive gaming or video editing. Buy the Motorola Razr+ 2025 if you value a smoother, more responsive experience, longer battery life for all-day use, and faster charging capabilities, justifying the higher investment.