Huawei Pocket S vs. Google Pixel Fold: A Detailed Comparison of Foldable Phones
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing software experience and long-term updates, the Google Pixel Fold is the superior choice. However, the Huawei Pocket S offers compelling value, particularly for those seeking a more affordable foldable without sacrificing core functionality, despite its 4G limitation.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Pocket S | Google Pixel Fold |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 02 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 11 | Available. Released 2023, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 170 x 75.5 x 7.2 mmFolded: 87.3 x 75.5 x 15.2 mm | Unfolded: 139.7 x 158.7 x 5.8 mmFolded: 139.7 x 79.5 x 12.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 283 g (9.98 oz) |
| - | IPX8 water resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1188 x 2790 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~442 ppi density) | 1840 x 2208 pixels (~378 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.6 inches, 183.3 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | Foldable OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: OLED, 1.04 inch, 340 x 340 pixels, 328 ppi | Cover display: OLED, 120Hz, HDR, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 5.8 inches, 1080 x 2092 pixels, 17.4:9 ratio, 408 ppi 1200 nits (HBM), 1550 nits (peak) | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 670) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 4G (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 40 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 10.7 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10.8 MP, f/3.1, 112mm (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 121˚, (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 10.7 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Cover camera: 9.5 MP, f/2.2, 24mm (wide), 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired, 52% in 20 min 5W reverse wired | Wired, PD3.0 Wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4821 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Pink, Gren, Silver, Gold, Black | Porcelain, Obsidian |
| Models | BAL-AL60 | G9FPL |
| Price | About 830 EUR | € 670.87 / $ 389.26 / £ 899.99 |
Huawei Pocket S
- More affordable price point
- Faster 40W wired charging
- Potentially more compact design
- Limited to 4G connectivity
- Less powerful Snapdragon 778G processor
- Uncertain software update support
Google Pixel Fold
- Powerful Google Tensor G2 processor
- 5G connectivity
- Superior software experience and updates
- Higher price tag
- Slower charging speeds (details unknown)
- Larger and potentially heavier design
Display Comparison
While specific display specs (resolution, refresh rate) are missing for both, the Pocket S’s design emphasizes a nearly crease-free experience. The Pixel Fold, with its wider aspect ratio, is geared towards multitasking. The Tensor G2 likely supports variable refresh rate (LTPO) for power efficiency, a feature not confirmed for the Pocket S. Color accuracy will likely be superior on the Pixel Fold, given Google’s display calibration expertise. Bezels are a key differentiator, and visual comparisons suggest the Pixel Fold has slightly slimmer bezels.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel Fold’s camera system, while details are limited, benefits from Google’s renowned computational photography. The Tensor G2’s ISP is crucial for processing images quickly and efficiently. The Pocket S’s camera specs are unknown, but Huawei typically focuses on strong camera performance, even in mid-range devices. Expect the Pixel Fold to excel in low-light photography and dynamic range, leveraging Google’s software algorithms. The absence of detailed sensor information for the Pocket S makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Pixel Fold’s software advantage is likely to be decisive.
Performance
The Google Pixel Fold’s Tensor G2 (5nm) represents a significant leap in processing power compared to the Huawei Pocket S’s Snapdragon 778G (6nm). The Tensor G2’s octa-core configuration, featuring Cortex-X1 cores clocked at 2.85 GHz, provides substantially faster CPU performance for demanding applications. While the 778G is a capable mid-range chip, the Tensor G2’s integrated machine learning capabilities and optimized image signal processor (ISP) offer advantages in camera processing and AI-driven features. The Pocket S’s 4G limitation is a major drawback for users requiring fast mobile data speeds. The Pixel Fold benefits from potentially faster LPDDR5X RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is unspecified for both devices. However, the Pocket S’s 40W wired charging is significantly faster than the Pixel Fold’s wired and wireless charging options (details unspecified). The 52% charge in 20 minutes for the Pocket S suggests a quicker top-up time. The Tensor G2’s 5nm process *should* offer better power efficiency, potentially offsetting the Pocket S’s faster charging. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns and display settings.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Pocket S if you need a stylish, compact foldable at a significantly lower price, and 4G connectivity is sufficient for your usage. It’s ideal for media consumption and casual use. Buy the Google Pixel Fold if you prioritize a seamless software experience, 5G connectivity, and a more powerful processor for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. It’s geared towards power users and those invested in the Google ecosystem.