Huawei P60 Pro vs Mate 50 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Huawei P60 Pro boasts a brighter display and slightly faster charging, while the Mate 50 Pro edges out with a marginally better endurance rating and potentially more refined camera features (XMAGE). Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: display brightness or slightly longer battery life and camera enhancements.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei P60 Pro | Huawei Mate 50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 23 | 2022, September 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 31 | Available. Released 2022, September 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 161 x 74.5 x 8.3 mm (6.34 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 162.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 205 g / 209 g (7.23 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 6m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Kunlun Glass | Huawei Kunlun Glass |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2700 pixels (~444 ppi density) | 1212 x 2616 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~428 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.7 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 111.8 cm2 (~91.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.1 (China), EMUI 13.1 (Europe), no Google Play Services | EMUI 13 (International), HarmonyOS 3.0 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 25mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.1, 90mm (telephoto), PDAF, sensor-shift OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS, HDR Vivid | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, 720p@960fps, 720p@3840fps, HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, (ultrawide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR Vivid | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (B1I+B1c+B2a), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| BDS Satellite Message | BDS Satellite Message (sending only) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 88W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless | 66W wired 50W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4815 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Violet, Rococo Pearl | Black, Silver, Purple, Orange |
| Models | MNA-AL00, MNA-LX9 | DCO-AL00, DCO-LX9 |
| Price | € 738.50 | About 900 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 96h | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.3 LUFS (Good) | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1030473 (v9) GeekBench: 4422 (v6) GFXBench: 65fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 979921 (v9) GeekBench: 3839 (v5.1) GFXBench: 68fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei P60 Pro
- Brighter Display (1135 nits)
- Faster Wired Charging (88W)
- Reverse Wireless Charging
- Excellent Color Accuracy
- Slightly lower endurance rating
- Potentially less advanced camera features compared to Mate 50 Pro
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
- Slightly better endurance rating (104h)
- Potentially more refined camera (XMAGE)
- Premium Design & Build Quality
- Slower Wired Charging (66W)
- Lower Max Brightness (946 nits)
- No Reverse Wireless Charging
Display Comparison
The P60 Pro takes the lead in display brightness, measuring a peak of 1135 nits compared to the Mate 50 Pro's 946 nits. Both feature excellent contrast ratios (Infinite, nominally), offering deep blacks and vibrant colors. While both are OLED panels, the P60 Pro's higher brightness makes it more usable in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature impressive camera systems, but the Mate 50 Pro is generally considered to have a slightly more advanced setup, particularly with Huawei's XMAGE image processing. The P60 Pro excels in detail and color accuracy, while the Mate 50 Pro may offer better low-light performance and more creative shooting modes. Specific camera hardware details (sensor sizes, lens apertures) would be needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
Both phones share the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G chipset and CPU configuration, ensuring comparable performance in everyday tasks and demanding games. Real-world performance differences are likely to be minimal, with software optimization playing a larger role.
Battery Life
The Mate 50 Pro demonstrates a slightly better endurance rating (104h vs 96h), suggesting marginally longer battery life under typical usage. The P60 Pro offers faster wired charging (88W vs 66W), while both support 50W wireless charging. The P60 Pro also includes reverse wireless charging.
Buying Guide
The Huawei P60 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize a vibrant, bright display for media consumption and appreciate fast charging. The Huawei Mate 50 Pro is a better fit for those who value extended battery life and a potentially more advanced camera system, particularly for photography enthusiasts.