Both the Huawei P Smart S and the Oppo A53s 5G target the budget-conscious consumer seeking 5G connectivity. However, they approach this goal with different chipsets and design philosophies. The P Smart S relies on Huawei’s Kirin 710F, while the A53s 5G leverages MediaTek’s Dimensity 700. This comparison will dissect the key differences to help you determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Oppo A53s 5G is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700, built on a 7nm process, provides a substantial performance advantage over the Huawei P Smart S’s 12nm Kirin 710F. While both offer 10W charging, the A53s 5G’s superior processing power makes it the better choice for demanding tasks and 5G applications.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 26, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 09. Released 2020, June 09 | 2021, April 27 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, May 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 157.4 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.20 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 164 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 189.6 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~418 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 95.8 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 710F (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Breathing Crystal, Midnight Black | Crystal Blue, Ink Black |
| Models | - | CPH2321 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 170 EUR |
Huawei P Smart S
- Familiar Huawei UI (though GMS-free)
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Older, less efficient Kirin 710F chipset
- Lack of Google Mobile Services
- Slower performance in demanding applications
Oppo A53s 5G
- More powerful and efficient MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset
- 5G connectivity
- Better performance for gaming and multitasking
- Oppo’s ColorOS may not appeal to all users
- 10W charging is slow
- Potentially slightly higher price
Display Comparison
Neither Huawei nor Oppo provide detailed display specifications in the provided data. However, given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels. The real difference lies under the hood. The chipset’s graphics processing capabilities will impact the smoothness of scrolling and video playback. Without knowing the refresh rates, it’s difficult to assess the user experience beyond the processing power influencing display responsiveness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will heavily depend on the sensor size and image processing algorithms. Given the market segment, it’s probable that both rely on software enhancements to improve image quality. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is likely on both devices, meaning image stabilization will be primarily digital, potentially resulting in softer images in low-light conditions. The 2MP macro cameras often found on phones in this price range offer limited practical benefit due to their low resolution and fixed focus.
Performance
The core difference between these two devices is the chipset. The Oppo A53s 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm) is a significant upgrade over the Huawei P Smart S’s Kirin 710F (12nm). The 7nm process allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, translating to better performance and reduced heat. The Dimensity 700’s CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – is architecturally superior to the Kirin 710F’s 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53. The Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 700 offer a substantial IPC (Instructions Per Clock) improvement over the A73 cores, resulting in faster application loading and smoother multitasking. This benefits users who frequently switch between apps or engage in light gaming.
Battery Life
Both devices are equipped with 10W wired charging, which is relatively slow by today’s standards. The actual battery capacity isn’t specified, but the Dimensity 700’s superior power efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery in the Oppo A53s 5G. Users should expect approximately 2.5-3.5 hours to fully charge both devices. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the A53s 5G’s more efficient chipset should provide slightly longer screen-on time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei P Smart S if you prioritize a familiar Huawei software experience (though limited by the lack of Google Mobile Services) and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Oppo A53s 5G if you want a more responsive experience, better 5G performance, and a more versatile chipset capable of handling more demanding applications and games.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Huawei P Smart S's lack of Google Mobile Services significantly impact usability?
Yes, the absence of Google Mobile Services (GMS) means you won't have access to the Google Play Store, Gmail, YouTube, or Google Maps natively. While Huawei's AppGallery offers alternatives, the selection is limited, and sideloading apps can be cumbersome for less tech-savvy users.
❓ Will the Oppo A53s 5G's Dimensity 700 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The MediaTek Dimensity 700 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to adjust graphics settings to medium or low to maintain a stable frame rate. While it won't deliver a flagship gaming experience, it's a significant improvement over the Kirin 710F and provides a playable experience.
❓ How much faster is the 5G connectivity on the Oppo A53s 5G compared to 4G?
5G speeds on the Oppo A53s 5G can be significantly faster than 4G, potentially offering download speeds several times higher depending on network availability and coverage. However, real-world 5G performance varies greatly based on location and carrier infrastructure.
