Huawei P Smart S vs. Motorola Moto G 5G: Which Budget 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset, built on an 8nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Huawei P Smart S’s 12nm Kirin 710F. While both offer similar battery endurance ratings, the Moto G 5G’s 20W charging is a significant convenience advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei P Smart S | Motorola Moto G 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 26, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 09. Released 2020, June 09 | 2020, November 05. Released 2020, December 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157.4 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.20 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~418 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 95.8 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Kirin 710F (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G51 MP4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 2GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 2 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Breathing Crystal, Midnight Black | Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1419:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.1 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 312461 (v8) GeekBench: 1980 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei P Smart S
- Potentially lower price point (depending on market)
- Functional smartphone for basic tasks
- Acceptable battery endurance
- Older Kirin 710F chipset offers limited performance
- Slow 10W charging
- Huawei ecosystem limitations
Motorola Moto G 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 750G chipset for improved performance
- 20W fast charging for quicker top-ups
- More open Android experience
- May be slightly more expensive than the P Smart S
- Similar battery endurance to the P Smart S
- Design may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1419:1, indicating similar panel quality in terms of black levels. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 484 nits, which will translate to better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the P Smart S (brightness data unavailable). The lack of high refresh rate support on either device is typical for this price segment, but the G 5G’s higher brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is missing. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 750G generally provides superior image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions. The Moto G 5G is likely to deliver more consistent and detailed photos and videos. The absence of details on the P Smart S’s camera system makes it difficult to assess its capabilities beyond basic functionality.
Performance
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm) in the Moto G 5G represents a significant architectural leap over the Kirin 710F (12nm) found in the P Smart S. The 750G’s Kryo 570 cores, with a 2x2.2 GHz + 6x1.8 GHz configuration, offer superior single-core and multi-core performance. The 8nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. While both CPUs feature octa-core designs, the Snapdragon’s architecture is demonstrably more efficient and powerful.
Battery Life
Both the Huawei P Smart S and Motorola Moto G 5G achieve an endurance rating of 131 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Moto G 5G’s 20W wired charging is double the speed of the P Smart S’s 10W charging. This translates to significantly faster top-ups, reducing downtime and offering greater convenience. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed gives the Moto G 5G a practical advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei P Smart S if your primary need is a functional smartphone with basic capabilities and you are comfortable with the limitations of the Huawei ecosystem. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G if you prioritize performance for gaming or multitasking, faster charging, and a more open Android experience. The Moto G 5G is the better option for users who want a phone that feels responsive and future-proofed.