The Huawei Nova Y73 and Oppo A58 4G represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The Nova Y73 leverages Huawei’s in-house Kirin chipset, while the A58 4G opts for MediaTek’s Helio G85. This comparison will dissect their key differences, focusing on performance, charging, and overall user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and faster charging, the Oppo A58 4G emerges as the better choice. Its Helio G85, built on a more modern 12nm process, offers a slight edge in CPU and GPU performance, and the 33W charging, with its documented 56% charge in 30 minutes, is more efficient than the Nova Y73’s 40W system.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 28 | 2023, July 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 03 | Available. Released 2023, July 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 76.6 x 8.3 mm (6.54 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 710A (14 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, EMUI 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 40W wired
5W reverse wired | 33W wired, 56% in 30 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6620 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Glowing Black, Dazzling Green |
| Models | MGA-LX3 | CPH2577 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 150 EUR |
Huawei Nova Y73
- 40W wired charging (potentially faster full charge)
- Huawei’s software features and ecosystem
- Reverse wired charging for accessories
- Older 14nm Kirin 710A chipset
- Potentially less efficient charging curve
- Software restrictions due to geopolitical factors
Oppo A58 4G
- More modern 12nm MediaTek Helio G85 chipset
- Faster charging efficiency (56% in 30 min)
- Streamlined Android experience
- Lower peak charging wattage (33W)
- Potentially less brand recognition than Huawei
- Image processing may be less vibrant than Huawei
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. However, detailed specs like resolution and refresh rate are missing. The focus here is on internal performance. Display quality will likely be similar, with neither offering features like high peak brightness or color accuracy found in higher-end models.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a direct comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor and supporting lenses. However, the inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on both devices suggests limited utility; these sensors often lack the detail and dynamic range needed for compelling macro photography. Image processing will likely differ, with Huawei historically favoring more saturated colors and Oppo leaning towards a more natural look. The absence of OIS on either device indicates that low-light performance will be heavily reliant on software processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A58 4G’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm) utilizes a more modern fabrication process than the Huawei Nova Y73’s Kirin 710A (14nm). While both are octa-core CPUs, the Helio G85’s configuration – 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 – offers a more efficient and powerful architecture compared to the Kirin 710A’s 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53. The A75 cores in the Helio G85 provide a noticeable boost in single-core performance, impacting app launch speeds and general responsiveness. This translates to a smoother experience for everyday tasks and a slight advantage in gaming. The 12nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Huawei Nova Y73 features 40W wired charging, while the Oppo A58 4G supports 33W. While the Nova Y73’s wattage is higher, Oppo claims a 56% charge in 30 minutes for the A58 4G. This suggests a more optimized charging curve and potentially better power delivery efficiency. The actual battery capacity of both devices is not specified, but the combination of the Helio G85’s efficiency and the A58 4G’s charging performance likely results in comparable, if not slightly better, real-world battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Nova Y73 if you prioritize Huawei’s software ecosystem and potentially benefit from its reverse wired charging capability. This is useful for topping up accessories. Buy the Oppo A58 4G if you prefer a more streamlined Android experience, slightly better gaming performance due to the Helio G85’s architecture, and a faster, more efficient charging cycle, making it ideal for users on the go.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G85 in the Oppo A58 4G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Helio G85 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to stick to medium graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. The GPU isn't a powerhouse, but it's sufficient for casual gaming and less demanding titles. The 12nm process helps mitigate thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Does the Huawei Nova Y73’s 40W charging actually translate to a significantly faster full charge compared to the Oppo A58 4G’s 33W?
While 40W is a higher number, Oppo’s claim of 56% charge in 30 minutes for the A58 4G suggests a more optimized charging curve. The Nova Y73’s 40W may not deliver a proportionally faster full charge due to potential inefficiencies in power delivery. Real-world testing would be needed to confirm the exact difference.
❓ Are there any concerns about software updates and long-term support for the Huawei Nova Y73?
Huawei’s access to Google Mobile Services (GMS) is limited due to geopolitical factors. The Nova Y73 runs on EMUI, Huawei’s custom Android skin, and relies on Huawei’s AppGallery for app distribution. While EMUI receives updates, the availability and frequency of updates may be less consistent compared to Oppo’s ColorOS, which benefits from direct access to Google’s services.
