The Huawei nova Y71 and Oppo A77s represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, they take different approaches to achieving this. The Y71 relies on Huawei’s Kirin 710A chipset, while the A77s leverages the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680. This comparison dives deep into the architectural differences and real-world implications of these choices, helping you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing efficiency and faster charging, the Oppo A77s emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 680, built on a more modern 6nm process, offers improved power efficiency and its 33W charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the Y71’s 22.5W.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2022, October 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 168.3 x 77.7 x 9 mm (6.63 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 187 g / 190 g (6.60 oz) |
| | - | IP54, dust and water resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Kirin 710A (14 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G51 MP4 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | EMUI 12, no Google Play Services | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 69 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold | Sunset Orange, Starry Black |
| Models | - | CPH2473 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 220 EUR |
Huawei nova Y71
- Familiar Huawei software experience
- Potentially lower price point (depending on region)
- Slightly higher CPU clock speeds on some cores
- Less efficient Kirin 710A chipset
- Slower 22.5W charging
- Older 14nm manufacturing process
Oppo A77s
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset (6nm)
- Faster 33W charging (69 minutes to 100%)
- Potentially smoother performance in sustained tasks
- Oppo’s ColorOS may not appeal to all users
- Potentially slightly higher price point
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on processing, we can infer both likely utilize LCD panels common in this price bracket. The absence of information regarding refresh rates suggests both are likely capped at 60Hz. Bezels are expected to be noticeable on both, prioritizing cost-effectiveness over premium aesthetics. Color accuracy will likely be standard for the segment, leaning towards vibrant but not necessarily color-accurate profiles.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, it’s reasonable to assume both devices feature a primary camera and supporting lenses (likely including a depth or macro sensor). The image processing algorithms will differ significantly between Huawei and Oppo, with Huawei historically favoring more saturated and contrast-boosted images. The Snapdragon 680’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally more capable than the Kirin 710A’s, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction in the A77s. The absence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A77s’ Snapdragon 680 (6nm) benefits from a more advanced manufacturing process compared to the Huawei nova Y71’s Kirin 710A (14nm). This translates to better power efficiency and potentially lower thermal throttling under sustained loads. While the Y71’s Cortex-A73 cores have a slightly higher clock speed (2.0 GHz vs 2.4 GHz on the A77s’ Kryo 265 Gold), the architectural improvements and process node advantage of the Snapdragon 680 likely result in superior real-world performance, especially in multi-threaded tasks. The Snapdragon 680’s Kryo cores are designed for sustained performance, while the Kirin 710A may exhibit more noticeable slowdowns during prolonged use.
Battery Life
While the battery capacities aren't specified, the charging speeds provide a clear advantage to the Oppo A77s. Its 33W wired charging, capable of a full charge in 69 minutes, significantly outperforms the Huawei Y71’s 22.5W charging. This faster charging is particularly beneficial for users who frequently find themselves needing to quickly top up their battery. Even with a similar battery capacity, the Snapdragon 680’s superior efficiency will likely result in longer overall battery life for the A77s.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei nova Y71 if you prioritize a familiar Huawei software experience and are comfortable with potentially slower charging speeds. Buy the Oppo A77s if you value a more efficient processor, faster charging, and a generally smoother user experience, particularly for everyday tasks and light gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Kirin 710A struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Kirin 710A can run PUBG Mobile, but likely at lower graphics settings and frame rates to maintain a stable experience. The Snapdragon 680 in the A77s will offer a smoother experience, allowing for higher settings and potentially more consistent frame rates due to its more efficient architecture.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Oppo A77s compared to the Huawei Y71’s 22.5W?
The Oppo A77s can reach a full charge in approximately 69 minutes. The Huawei Y71, with its 22.5W charging, will take considerably longer – likely exceeding 90 minutes, potentially approaching two hours, depending on battery capacity. This difference is significant for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 680 offer noticeable improvements in app loading times compared to the Kirin 710A?
Yes, the Snapdragon 680’s more modern architecture and efficient processing will result in faster app loading times and smoother multitasking compared to the Kirin 710A. While both are capable of handling everyday apps, the A77s will feel more responsive.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance noticeable for basic tasks like calling, texting, and browsing?
For basic tasks, the difference will be minimal. Both chipsets are capable of handling these functions without issue. However, the Snapdragon 680’s efficiency will contribute to slightly better battery life even during these everyday activities.
