Huawei nova Flip S vs Xiaomi Mix Fold 3: A Detailed Comparison of Foldable Designs

The foldable market is heating up, with distinct approaches emerging. Huawei's nova Flip S offers a stylish, compact flip-phone experience, while Xiaomi's Mix Fold 3 aims for a full-fledged tablet replacement with its larger form factor. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on performance, battery life, and display quality to determine which foldable best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing a blend of style and affordability, the Huawei nova Flip S presents a compelling package. However, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 dominates in raw performance and display quality, making it the superior choice for power users and those demanding a more immersive foldable experience.

PHONES
Phone Names Huawei nova Flip S Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42
5G bandsSA/NSA1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2025, October 172023, August 14
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, October 25Available. Released 2023, August 14
Body
BuildAluminum alloy frame, glass back or silicone polymer (eco leather) backGlass front (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back or aramid fiber back, aluminum frame
DimensionsUnfolded: 169.8 x 75.4 x 6.9 mmFolded: 87.8 x 75.4 x 15.1 mmUnfolded: 161.2 x 143.3 x 5.3 mm Folded: 161.2 x 73.5 x 10.9 mm
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight195 g or 199 g (6.88 oz)255 g or 259 g (8.99 oz)
Display
Resolution1136 x 2690 pixels (~421 ppi density)1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density)
Size6.94 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio)8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeFoldable LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDRFoldable LTPO OLED+, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-coreOcta-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetKirin 8030Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
GPU-Adreno 740
OSHarmonyOS 5.1Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide)-
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panoramaColor spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama, Leica lenses
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.2x optical zoom 10 MP, f/2.9, 115mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
Video4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960/1920fps, Dolby Vision HDR
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR, panoramaHDR, panorama
Single32 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide)20 MP, f/2.3, 23mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.8µm Cover camera: 20 MP, f/2.3, 23mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.8µm
Video4K, 1080p1080p@30/60fps
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE, L2HC5.3, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavICGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band (tri-band after future SW update)
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging66W wired, 100% in 40 min 5W reverse wired67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 40 min 50W wireless, 100% in 55 min
TypeLi-Po 4400 mAhLi-Po 4800 mAh
Misc
ColorsGreen, Pink, White, Black, Nova Black, BlueBlack, Gold
ModelsPSD-AL802308CPXD0C
PriceAbout 410 EURAbout 1150 EUR

Huawei nova Flip S

  • More affordable price point
  • Compact and pocketable design
  • Stylish flip phone aesthetic

  • Less powerful processor
  • Likely inferior display quality
  • Limited camera information

Xiaomi Mix Fold 3

  • Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
  • Brighter and larger display
  • Faster and more versatile charging options (wired & wireless)

  • Higher price tag
  • Larger and less pocketable form factor
  • Potential for more significant weight

Display Comparison

The Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1277 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the nova Flip S’s display specs are not provided, flip phones generally prioritize compactness over screen real estate. The Mix Fold 3’s larger panel is likely to offer a more immersive viewing experience, especially for video consumption and gaming. The absence of LTPO information for the nova Flip S suggests it may not dynamically adjust refresh rates for power saving like the Mix Fold 3 likely does.

Camera Comparison

Detailed camera specs for the nova Flip S are missing, but Huawei typically focuses on computational photography. The Mix Fold 3’s camera system, while details are limited in the provided data, benefits from the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s advanced ISP (Image Signal Processor). This allows for faster image processing and improved low-light performance. Without specific sensor details for the nova Flip S, it’s difficult to assess its capabilities, but the Mix Fold 3’s chipset advantage suggests superior image and video quality, particularly in challenging conditions.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Mix Fold 3’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a flagship powerhouse, featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.36 GHz, alongside A715 and A710 performance cores, and efficient A510 cores. This architecture delivers substantial performance gains over the Huawei nova Flip S’s Kirin 8030. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 also translates to superior thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon’s architecture is demonstrably more advanced, benefiting demanding users.

Battery Life

The Xiaomi Mix Fold 3’s endurance rating of 117 hours indicates a robust battery life, despite its larger display. Both devices offer 67W wired charging, achieving a full charge in 40 minutes. However, the Mix Fold 3 adds 50W wireless charging, reaching 100% in 55 minutes, providing greater charging flexibility. The larger battery capacity (implied by the endurance rating) of the Mix Fold 3, combined with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s efficiency, likely results in longer real-world usage compared to the nova Flip S.

Buying Guide

Buy the Huawei nova Flip S if you need a pocketable, fashionable foldable that excels at social media and quick tasks, and value a lower price point. Buy the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 if you prefer a larger screen for multitasking, gaming, and content creation, and demand top-tier performance from the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Kirin 8030 in the Huawei nova Flip S struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Kirin 8030 is a capable mid-range chipset, but it will likely exhibit more noticeable frame drops and throttling in graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3. Expect to lower graphics settings for a smoother experience.
❓ How does the larger size of the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 affect one-handed usability?
The Xiaomi Mix Fold 3’s larger form factor makes one-handed operation challenging. It’s designed for two-handed use, especially when unfolded. The Huawei nova Flip S, being a flip phone, remains relatively compact and more manageable with one hand.
❓ Is the 50W wireless charging on the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 significantly faster than standard wireless charging?
Yes, 50W wireless charging is considerably faster than typical wireless charging speeds (often 15-25W). It allows for a full charge in approximately 55 minutes, making it a convenient alternative to wired charging, especially for topping up the battery throughout the day.
❓ Given the lack of detailed camera specs for the Huawei nova Flip S, should I expect a significant difference in photo quality compared to the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?
Based on the chipset difference and Xiaomi’s history of strong camera performance, it’s reasonable to expect the Mix Fold 3 to deliver superior photo and video quality, particularly in low-light conditions and with dynamic range. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP provides a significant advantage in image processing.